The insane social justice thread

[jamil]

After thinking that song up, I had to sing it in my head over and over.... probably all evening...

Thanks dude. Now it's in my head. Not a bad tune though. I'll probably call it up on iTunes radio.

 

[jamil]

The Real Meanings Of 20 Buzzwords That Feminists Use

They missed a common word:

Problematic: The word SJWs use for an offense for which they can't articulate anything specifically offensive, yet still causes them to feel offended.

 

[actaeon277]

I look suspiciously like a fat middle aged white guy... but... YMMV.

But...... how do you identify?

 

[Mr Evilwrench]

I just don't find fat middle aged white guys hot.

Too soon?

 

[Expat]

But...... how do you identify?

As I understand, it can just be whatever I say I am.

 

[jamil]

I identify as disinterested.

 

[actaeon277]

Watching "Scorpion" on TV, and the team is at a college.
One of the students complains about a microagression.
The main character says, "If it's micro, then why care?" (Not exact quote)

 

[indiucky]

And the colored girls go,
doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo

Thanks dude...Finally got Celtic Women "Little Drummer Boy out of my head"...

I knew it would take some gritty Lou Reed to do it...Now I am going to pull up the Cowboy Junkies version of "Sweet Jane" so I can stare at that Canadian chicks eyebrows....

[video=youtube;BHRFZFmEq9o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHRFZFmEq9o[/video]

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Tumblristas, in one GIF:

 

[cavemike]

I have been led down a Lou Reed rabbit hole by indiucky. I will will leave everyone with this

https://youtu.be/G7Ch4O7wmuY



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM9JG-oQm1Y

 

[ArcadiaGP]

NYC Will Fine You $250,000 For 'Misgendering' A Transsexual - Breitbart

 

[actaeon277]

NYC Will Fine You $250,000 For 'Misgendering' A Transsexual - Breitbart

Refer to everyone as dumb ass.

 

[jamil]

NYC Will Fine You $250,000 For 'Misgendering' A Transsexual - Breitbart

It's not like THAT law won't be challenged.

 

[actaeon277]

It's not like THAT law won't be challenged.

It's New York. Have to go up the ladder before you find a judge that actually read the Constitution.

 

[pudly]

Apparently the SJW culture is active in England as well. Damn...

British Universities Have Gone Crazy Too. Why? | Power Line

Meanwhile, across the UK, a general air of hostility is spreading against opinions that could cause even only a hint of distress in students, forcing the Financial Times to publish an editorial: “It is in the interest of universities to maintain a free and fertile academic environment.”

 

[actaeon277]

How about when the kids boycott a class, just let other kids in. Let these "children" get a job without a degree.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Trust me, this is worth your time to read. Thread on 4chan (either started by an SJW, or just bait...) and the epic response, from September of 2014:

What is wrong with social justice warriors? What do you have against us? We are fighting to end hate, to unite as one and love each other. We are fighting to be treated right without discrimination and for everyone to have equal opportunities.

So why? Why do you hate us? Why do you want us out? I don't understand.

And the epic response:

Bull****. You have no quantifiable metrics for injustice, so you have no victory conditions (for a very simplified example, when blacks hold X% of all engineering jobs and are only Y% of all prisoners, racism is ended). That would be fine by itself, but you believe in fighting injustice with injustice (gays have historically been denied gay marriage? Let's get random CEOs fired for opinions they held six years ago). You don't seek converts, you seek to punish and bully - straight white males who disagree with you must be purged and publicly humiliated. Even the jihadists will spare you if you convert; no apology or future correction will satisfy a SJW.

I could forgive that too if you weren't all hypocrites and liars. Your treatment of women and minority dissenters is appalling; if they don't want you acting on their behalf, that's their choice, not "internalized patriarchy" or whatever. You rob them of moral agency. When called out for these behaviors (as you always insist on calling out others), you lie. You strawman your opponents (criticized a woman? misogynist!), you group them with the worst (you're a gamer? You're as bad as the anonymous rape threateners!) and when confronted with your own flaws, you restate them less threateningly (motte and bailey argument). You phrase all arguments as kafkatraps (disagreeing with your assertion that we are evil is taken as proof that we're evil). You publish manipulated and misleading statistics, then lambaste anyone who questions them.

You insist on vigilante justice against random acts of the week for your two-minutes hate. Why is it the NFL's business to punish domestic violence? And, if it is their business, why isn't Hope Solo receiving the same attention from your side?

Then you claim to be arguing for equality, but you've taken the idea of racism (hatred based on skin color is bad) and replaced it with a new concept where only one race can be guilty of racism. You excuse racial prejudice and hatred based on what I've already explained are arbitrary, unmeasured states of being. Your solution for the unequal treatment of whites and blacks is to hold whites to a higher standard. Your side lobbied the FBI to redefine rape so more women victims would be counted, but also so that "made to penetrate" does not count, leaving male victims in the cold. Because male privilege, apparently.

Historically ignorant SJWs think whites hold collective guilt for the awful things our ancestors have done. But they don't care about the unspeakable atrocities by other races. The only difference between whites and others was that whites had the social and technological prowess to do evil efficiently; Africans, Asians, Indians, and everyone else practiced genocide and slavery, they were just less adept at doing it right. Given the means, they would have done the same. But nope, only whites are guilty; Arab oppression of blacks and Caucasians never happened, not to us, nope.

I've been lucky enough to grow up in America, so this **** is new to me. But I'm descended from puritans, and I know my history; I know how they treated dissent. I also know how commies treated dissent; I grew up next door to a grizzled old Russian who barely avoided the gulag by smuggling himself out of the country. I know what you petty tyrants have turned into every time you gained enough power.

Worst of all, you turn the very principles of freedom against us. We tolerate you because we believe in free speech and civil discourse, not bullying and violence. But that means we have to watch you advocate against that very freedom. We don't believe in ruining a stranger's professional life over an opinion, but that means we can't punish your actions.

We believe that the rightness of our actions should speak for itself. You believe in bullying, even as you claim to love the oppressed.

Funny how the evil and all-powerful patriarchy has seen fit to act according to SJW whims for all of recent memory, punishing those they hate and protecting those they love. Funny how the evil oppressor males have to speak anonymously, while the SJWs fighting the power can use their real names and get mainstream media coverage for fun and profit. How when a million straight white male nerds get bullied, no one cares, but the minute one gay hangs himself, suddenly bullying matters - and the solution, of course, is more bullying, but by the "right" people.

That's the arrogant core of it. You do the same evil, in the same pattern, as so many before you, because mob justice, punishing dissent, and repression of others is just fine and dandy so long as the "right" people are doing it to the "wrong" people.

All I ever asked was to be left alone.

 

[Expat]

Trust me, this is worth your time to read. Thread on 4chan (either started by an SJW, or just bait...) and the epic response, from September of 2014:



And the epic response:

That was a good response...

 

[OakRiver]

Sometimes a spade needs called a spade

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Just saw this great quote today:

"The larger the word salad someone uses to describe their sexuality, the more likely it just means 'slut'"