Your complaints may very well be well founded in this case. In the previous case to which I referred you didn't bother to pay attention that the marked price was after a rebate, failed to check the receipt at checkout, then blamed the Bass Pro employees for not telling you about the rebate. On top of all that, you made repeated posts complaining about not receiving your rebate starting well before the minimum processing time specified on the rebate had expired.
I don't know who was in the wrong here, but reading that first post made me think I was having a stroke.
Maybe a little fault on both sides?
Your complaints may very well be well founded in this case. In the previous case to which I referred you didn't bother to pay attention that the marked price was after a rebate, failed to check the receipt at checkout, then blamed the Bass Pro employees for not telling you about the rebate. On top of all that, you made repeated posts complaining about not receiving your rebate starting well before the minimum processing time specified on the rebate had expired.
So the bidders had guns pointed at them to make them bid? Buyer beware is the rule I follow.
YES buyer beware. That is why and what a buyer should be aware of.
Why should everyone have to make the same mistake.
People should be informed, so they do not make the same mistake.
If the information on what a "LOT #" quantity was visible. I would not have made any bidding.
Your complaints may very well be well founded in this case. In the previous case to which I referred you didn't bother to pay attention that the marked price was after a rebate, failed to check the receipt at checkout, then blamed the Bass Pro employees for not telling you about the rebate. On top of all that, you made repeated posts complaining about not receiving your rebate starting well before the minimum processing time specified on the rebate had expired.