Aren't funeral homes privately owned? What about cemeteries? (I honestly have no idea, but assume they are?)[/QUOT
In this case the funeral home is extremely close to a public road and grassy median.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Town of Hebron, IN, to restrict public protest
- Thread starter rambone
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Hebron is actually in Porter County. I grew up there, even back then it was becoming more like Lake County all the time. If the town council is anything like it was when I left, I would say this is a combination of two things: 1. they are too close to Chicago and slide further left all the time, and 2. the folks on the council are on some kind of power trip and would love to see their little kingdom get a bunch of widespread attention.
I haven't lived there in a long time but I don't think I'm too far off. Some of the names of the council members are very familiar.
Last edited:
level.eleven
Shooter
- May 12, 2009
- 4,673
- 48
Of course they are. Anarchism recognizes property over people. End of page.
level.eleven
Shooter
- May 12, 2009
- 4,673
- 48
This thread validates any local commission or any federal authority to institute buffers. For some it is physical. You fight speech with more speech, not violence.
SaintsNSinners
Shooter
As human being it utterly sickens me to my core to see people protest at soldiers funerals, but as a Veteran it gives me no greater thrill or joy to see the rights that I have bled for and my friends have died for being used.
The right to free speech and protest is a cornerstone of our way of life. If we could only engage the government on their terms what would we accomplish? If we can only get a redress on certain types of greviances what would we really accomplish?
If you really want a compromise allow all protest up to the beginning of memorial services, during the service allow only visual protest, and then all forms of protests can recommence at the close of services.
The right to free speech is guaranteed the right to a funeral is not.
The right to free speech and protest is a cornerstone of our way of life. If we could only engage the government on their terms what would we accomplish? If we can only get a redress on certain types of greviances what would we really accomplish?
If you really want a compromise allow all protest up to the beginning of memorial services, during the service allow only visual protest, and then all forms of protests can recommence at the close of services.
The right to free speech is guaranteed the right to a funeral is not.
Rights are just loopholes to you, aren't they?
Thats like saying a gun ban would be ok now because "mass murders" are happening, whereas before society was decent enough these incidents didnt happen
SaintsNSinners
Shooter
They truely do have the right to protest anywhere they so choose. As much as it sickens me as a human it is a victory in my book as a veteran and American. This is exactly what that ancient dusty old piece of paper was talking about. This is what our nation was founded on. Some of you protest any limitations being put on the 2nd amendment.. See the "Shall not be infringed" groups of people.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
It does not say to assemble and petition in a place where feelings wont get hurt, It doesnt say you can only petition this but not that, It doesnt say your view has to be commonly held by more people,
As to saying its not the right place I would have to say.....Wrong.... Who are you to decide what is and isnt proper? What gives you the right to apply limitations or regulations on a Right?
If I want to protest the governments waste of an american soldiers life in a war I dont think we should be in what better place to protest? What better visual backdrop.
If I wanted to protest the Bank bail outs would I be better suited to protest that on wall street than I would on say 25th and hillside in indy?
If I wanted to protest UN gun control wouldnt a better backdrop be infront of the UN than infront of a churchs chicken?
Just FYI the above does not represent my views personally. this post is to be taken as looking through a different viewpoint.
Isn't ignorance grand?
steveh_131
Grandmaster
One more 'common sense' restriction of our rights.
One more step towards tyranny.
Sooner or later it will be a right that you actually do care about. Hopefully by then there will be some people willing to man up and fight for liberty. But after seeing comments like this, I have my doubts.
Stupid people, stupid law. The sheeple will hardly notice another right being infringed. This exemplifies the problem with America today. The sheeple fail to recognize the implications of incremental-ism when it smacks them in the face. Thanks Hebron for making Indiana really look dumb.
As much as I abhor the group this law is aimed toward, I hope Hebron gets its collective butt sued off. There are better ways to fix this problem.
How can limiting free speech EVER be right?
As much as I abhor the group this law is aimed toward, I hope Hebron gets its collective butt sued off. There are better ways to fix this problem.
How can limiting free speech EVER be right?
Last edited:
