Just looking for a strong-enough distraction to put all of this behind us again.
A good politician scandal would do it. Someone high profile.
Or a medium-intensity military engagement. Several contenders for that.
Just looking for a strong-enough distraction to put all of this behind us again.
A good politician scandal would do it. Someone high profile.
Ya know I remember hearing very similar about bump stocks when Trump made his initial statement about them...
Just looking for a strong-enough distraction to put all of this behind us again.
A good politician scandal would do it. Someone high profile.
And that statement applies to bump stocks, as well. That Trump encouraged the administrative state to act in an unconstitutional manner is not the same thing as legislation being passed and signed into law.
Calling him out for crap he says/does isn't "routine never-trumping"...
Is your [STRIKE]never-trumping[/STRIKE] calling out helping?
If Trump said "I want to ban assault weapons with 100 round clips" today, would we be allowed to post about that here?
Or would the usuals come out and say, "Yeah, but he hasn't banned them yet!"
Right. It's worse.
If Trump said "I want to ban assault weapons with 100 round clips" today, would we be allowed to post about that here?
Or would the usuals come out and say, "Yeah, but he hasn't banned them yet!"
What's a 'strong' background check?
No, not really. (Assuming that SCOTUS does their job.)
I'm thinking that the ATF will be asked by their boss to take another look at pistol "brace" rulings. Oh, and 100 round drum magazines.
That's what I've been thinking too. I'm wondering if soon 30 rounders will be our cap....if we're lucky