Because technical victories are just as good as real ones? I mean who cares about that? Why not just discuss real the points?Specifics bro. I use them for a reason.
History is written by the victors. Don’t forget who PRINTS and teaches from the history books now.
While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I think you’re unfortunately incorrect in your assumptions.
Sorry...was replying to the poster who revived the thread. I didn’t realize two people would post in between his post and mine.This is why it's a good idea to quote the post you're replying to. I have no idea what this even refers to.
INGO moves fast these days.Sorry...was replying to the poster who revived the thread. I didn’t realize two people would post in between his post and mine.
But were they wearing p-hats?? (Kut's next objection)Police injured, more than 200 arrested at Trump inauguration protests in DC
Six police officers were injured and 217 protesters arrested Friday after a morning of peaceful protests and coordinated disruptions of Donald Trump's inauguration ceremony gave way to ugly street clashes in downtown Washington.www.cnn.com
Yeah you've made it pretty clear you couldn't care less about gun rights. Just stirring up crap on a gun forum.I didn't read Biden's gun control plan on his website. So no, not like that. But thank you for bringing up something completely unrelated just so you could reference moi. I enjoy the celebrity status bestowed upon me by my fans. I love you all, muah!
If one doesn't care enough about guns\gun rights to make that a top tier consideration in who they vote for, it seems rather odd to make the effort to participate as a member of a gun forum?Yeah you've made it pretty clear you couldn't care less about gun rights. Just stirring up crap on a gun forum.
...and you've made clear that I occupy your head rent free. I appreciate your fawning adulation.Yeah you've made it pretty clear you couldn't care less about gun rights. Just stirring up crap on a gun forum.
...Other than the fact that someone might, you know, own guns in Indiana. But I'm clear on the purity test, there a long history of that sort of thing in this nation. So not surprised.If one doesn't care enough about guns\gun rights to make that a top tier consideration in who they vote for, it seems rather odd to make the effort to participate as a member of a gun forum?
"Jamil: Well they could have had them rolled up in their pocket, I suppose, and that might be grounds for you saying they weren't _wearing_ them. But, I mean, that's really lame."But were they wearing p-hats?? (Kut's next objection)
...Other than the fact that someone might, you know, own guns in Indiana. But I'm clear on the purity test, there a long history of that sort of thing in this nation. So not surprised.
It's not that I doubt you own guns, it's that I find it perplexing that people who don't value gun rights enough to make it a weighty consideration when choosing who they vote for, would bother joining a gun forum, let alone participate with regularity....Other than the fact that someone might, you know, own guns in Indiana. But I'm clear on the purity test, there a long history of that sort of thing in this nation. So not surprised.
What's going on in this thread?—Bear with me, for this is a long one. But if you read the context(actually read it) they have been telling us this from the start.—
—Revelation 13
And this is why it's good to discuss things and listen to people. Running him off won't give you an answer.It's not that I doubt you own guns, it's that I find it perplexing that people who don't value gun rights enough to make it a weighty consideration when choosing who they vote for, would bother joining a gun forum, let alone participate with regularity.
It might not really be about a gun forum but that there is a politics sub-forum, maybe there aren't any decent alternatives?It's not that I doubt you own guns, it's that I find it perplexing that people who don't value gun rights enough to make it a weighty consideration when choosing who they vote for, would bother joining a gun forum, let alone participate with regularity.
I don't want to run him off. He implied I said that, I did not.And this is why it's good to discuss things and listen to people. Running him off won't give you an answer.
I for one am glad @Kutnupe14 is here. I'm left economically and am wrestling with how much, exactly, the 2A factors into my voting. One thing I've come to really appreciate though is more right leaning spots online seem to generally be more accepting of dissenting views than "prog" leaning ones.And this is why it's good to discuss things and listen to people. Running him off won't give you an answer.
So the right is actually the tolerant side?I for one am glad @Kutnupe14 is here. I'm left economically and am wrestling with how much, exactly, the 2A factors into my voting. One thing I've come to really appreciate though is more right leaning spots online seem to generally be more accepting of dissenting views than "prog" leaning ones.
Chunks of it, yeah. Certainly hasn't always been that way, and might not be in the future.So the right is actually the tolerant side?