Too soon to go paranoid?
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...-spoofing-attack-suggest-russian-cyberweapon/
Ships fooled in GPS spoofing attack suggest Russian cyberweapon
If the Russians can do it; smart money says China can, too
Or.... someone can get off the chair and look out the wjndow.
You mean visual observation? Sometimes the old ways are the best ways.
During normal steaming ops there should be no less than five people continuously scanning the horizon for contacts. The problem is that both of the most recent collisions happened in very high traffic areas at night. All you see are dozens of lights against a black canvas. This can be very deceptive as ships lights can merge and make you believe that two contacts are one or making you believe a contact is heading in one direction when it is not. Correlating visual contacts with radar contacts is easy when there are a dozen within 20 miles. When there are over a hundred, including multiple fishing vessels that might be DIW or barely making way it gets a lot tougher. Factor in sea return on your surface search radar, other atmospheric anomalies, weather, and fatigue of the watch team and it is very easy to imagine how things like this happen. Also, don't believe the talking heads when they talk about all the technology on these billion dollar warships and how could they possibly miss something coming at them. The surface search radars on most navy ships aren't any better than standard commercial navigation radars. Also, I retired about a dozen years ago so possibly things have changed but I have never seen a "collision avoidance system" on a U.S. Navy ship.
Most people don't even know what "sea return" is.
True. Being on a pitch dark bridge in a busy seaway trying to make sense of the surface picture, correlate your radar nav and visual fixes while staying precisely on schedule is not for the faint of heart.
You're making me homesick.
Yeah, I feel the same way. We should probably seek professional help.
I can't. I had to break up with Bacardi 151.
And a note: It's hard to fit that many lookouts on a sub's bridge.
But, they are VERY motivated. Subs tend to not have very many survivors.
Sounds like you guys could get some lucrative contracts as civilian trainers.
Seriously, there IS something to be said for having analog fallbacks to digital systems.
Sounds like you guys could get some lucrative contracts as civilian trainers.
Seriously, there IS something to be said for having analog fallbacks to digital systems.
That's the big lie with all the talking heads you see on TV. The surface picture on a U.S. Navy ship is done mostly manually just like we've done it for decades. The Aegis combat system doesn't like to do slow and close. It was designed for fast and far or fast and low.
Cause Aegis is anti-missile oriented.
That's the big lie with all the talking heads you see on TV. The surface picture on a U.S. Navy ship is done mostly manually just like we've done it for decades.
HA!Why would we need to train civies?