I'm pretty late to this party, but I favor a "New York" reload simply because I can have gun#2 up and running before gun #1 runs empty.
You raise a good point.
Drive through or by any college campus and you'll see a large percentage of the students walking with earbuds in their ears and their faces in their mobile phones. Change that to after dark and doing it alone and it's a recipe for unpleasant outcomes. It's shocking to see how many girls are out and about by themselves at night and completely oblivious to any sensory information that might give them enough time to avoid tragedy because they can't live 5 minutes with the earbuds and the screen.
With the exception of while jogging as my current runner's pack doesn't have room for a reload for my Shield, yes. My normal carry (as in, while not engaged in activities that preclude it) is still strong side carried Glock 17M and a spare magazine. The Shield has replaced my LCR as my backup.
Depends. I've done both. After my police action I knew I still had 28 in the gun and knew the gun was running fine. I saw no reason to reload in that situation and have a single shot for even a small amount of time, just in case things kicked off again. I have also seen (in training, competition, and real world) flubbed reloads where a functional firearm was taken out of service for, in gunfight terms, a lengthy period of time and the person's attention was then drawn to the gun instead of the problem as they tried to rectify it
Contrast to shooting the pitbull that latched on to my arm while jogging and then being confronted by the owners. Once more pressing tasks were accomplished, I used a speed strip to replace the fired cartridge. "More pressing" was assessing my injuries, calling 911, verbally de-escalating with the owner (who I later learned was a burglar and felon), and only then did reloading get it's turn.
Note in neither case did it affect the outcome.
No. The plan is disciplined and effective fire. What I've seen for people who shot their gun dry was a failure of both almost without fail. They ran the gun faster than their abilities, took multiple low probability shots (sometimes even at targets that were no longer even visible), and/or failed to complete the next cycle of the OODA loop and recognize the fight was over. As such they fired a lot of rounds that missed, were marginal hits, or were shooting at a corpse or fleeing suspect until the gun went dry. I've satisfied myself through both training and experience that I can resist the urge to run the gun like a sewing machine, can hold my fire until I have a high probability target, put effective hits on the target, then recognize the fight is over. As such, I'm fine with a partially loaded gun until I'm pretty danged sure I've got time and opportunity to reload with no consequences if I'm interrupted. The exception would be a tube fed shotgun where an aborted reload only costs you the shell you drop and doesn't affect the readiness of the gun.
No. My awareness of my surroundings is significantly more important to my survival than the number of rounds left in the gun. Even if I have two rounds left, my odds of successfully engaging another threat I'm aware of with two rounds is exponentially higher than my odds of successfully engaging a threat I'm unaware of with a fully loaded gun. You can make a pretty good argument for doing both at the same time, hanging your hat on the fact your reload probably won't take more time than your "OOD" time from the OODA loop and by the time you get back to "A" your gun is up again...assuming no bobbles of the reload. Self-awareness of your own skills and reaction to post-shooting stress can change that answer. I know how hard it is for me personally to break out of tunnel vision and the amount of concentration required to actually see vs just look around, so unless I execute the reload subconsciously I won't be tying up any conscious brain power until post-scan.
At this point, I'm more concerned with finding a way to carry a good tourniquet than more ammunition. I've been carrying a RAT, which is easy to pocket or ankle carry. I've learned that it's apparently not that great for adults, and the larger the adult the less effective it is. Probably better off as it's own thread, but finding a way to carry an effective tourniquet I can reach with either hand is probably my highest reward change to EDC at the moment. I'm experimenting with a belt carried small-of-the-back holder for the SOFT-T but am not impressed so far.
I have seen several hundred people run their gun dry with no thought of topping off in training. What are they going to do for real? History says what they do in practice.
I'm especially frustrated when I see people holster empty guns while training when they clearly have at least one loaded magazine on their person. I don't know if it's worse with the slide locked back or if they take the time to deliberately release the slide, then holster their unloaded gun.
Sometimes that arises from the person's primary or only experience being from shooting sports that require cold ranges. We've all seen experienced USPSA and/or IDPA shooters unload and reholster after a repetition of a drill. Most of those people can break that bad habit if they choose. It's a different issue for people who are just not concerned about the status of their weapon.
I'd like to add something I've said before to my friends and colleagues who shoot the gun games frequently. When you have concluded a course of fire, it is in your best interests to stop automatically starting the unload and show clear procedure as soon as you are finished. You will be better served in life if you wait until you are directed to unload, etc. by the ranger officer and do each step at their command and not by rote. In addition to minimizing a "training scar," it's safer to be more deliberate about the process. I like to practice my "scanning" after I am done by looking at the targets and ensuring that they have holes in them (whether I start shooting again or not if I see a miss is a different conversation) while I am waiting for the "If you are finished . . ." and then I go through the steps as commanded. I do not want unloading and holstering to be a conditioned response.
I'm especially frustrated when I see people holster empty guns while training when they clearly have at least one loaded magazine on their person. I don't know if it's worse with the slide locked back or if they take the time to deliberately release the slide, then holster their unloaded gun.
Sometimes that arises from the person's primary or only experience being from shooting sports that require cold ranges. We've all seen experienced USPSA and/or IDPA shooters unload and reholster after a repetition of a drill. Most of those people can break that bad habit if they choose. It's a different issue for people who are just not concerned about the status of their weapon.
I'd like to add something I've said before to my friends and colleagues who shoot the gun games frequently. When you have concluded a course of fire, it is in your best interests to stop automatically starting the unload and show clear procedure as soon as you are finished. You will be better served in life if you wait until you are directed to unload, etc. by the ranger officer and do each step at their command and not by rote. In addition to minimizing a "training scar," it's safer to be more deliberate about the process. I like to practice my "scanning" after I am done by looking at the targets and ensuring that they have holes in them (whether I start shooting again or not if I see a miss is a different conversation) while I am waiting for the "If you are finished . . ." and then I go through the steps as commanded. I do not want unloading and holstering to be a conditioned response.
[/QUOTE]I carry a RAT, but know others who like these ankle kits for tourniquets:
https://www.narescue.com/ankle-trauma-holster.html
That one has some extra med stuff on it, might make it bulkier than you need.
At this point, I'm more concerned with finding a way to carry a good tourniquet than more ammunition. I've been carrying a RAT, which is easy to pocket or ankle carry. I've learned that it's apparently not that great for adults, and the larger the adult the less effective it is. Probably better off as it's own thread, but finding a way to carry an effective tourniquet I can reach with either hand is probably my highest reward change to EDC at the moment. I'm experimenting with a belt carried small-of-the-back holder for the SOFT-T but am not impressed so far.
[/QUOTE]I carry a RAT, but know others who like these ankle kits for tourniquets:
https://www.narescue.com/ankle-trauma-holster.html
That one has some extra med stuff on it, might make it bulkier than you need.
At this point, I'm more concerned with finding a way to carry a good tourniquet than more ammunition. I've been carrying a RAT, which is easy to pocket or ankle carry. I've learned that it's apparently not that great for adults, and the larger the adult the less effective it is. Probably better off as it's own thread, but finding a way to carry an effective tourniquet I can reach with either hand is probably my highest reward change to EDC at the moment. I'm experimenting with a belt carried small-of-the-back holder for the SOFT-T but am not impressed so far.