XM193 or XM855 bulk 5.56 ammo ?

[dom1104]

This is... a lot of epeen waggin.

I couldnt care less what it is, reject, non reject... who cares.

Is it good ammo? if so.. shoot it. If not ... who the heck cares?

 

[windellmc]

I've handled, opened, distributed, shot, etc MANY, MANY cans of ammo and I've never seen or even heard of that

I read about it on either AR15.com or M4carbine.net. Not sure which one. I think it was in linked belts for the SAW.

 

[Destro]

This is... a lot of epeen waggin.

I couldnt care less what it is, reject, non reject... who cares.

Is it good ammo? if so.. shoot it. If not ... who the heck cares?

because not everybody buys ammo for paper targets, and some people want the best money can buy

 

[dom1104]

because not everybody buys ammo for paper targets, and some people want the best money can buy

The best that money can buy? Are you serious?

The best that money can buy, being XM193? Really?

There are people who think that the best ammo you can buy is XM193?

 

[Destro]

The best that money can buy? Are you serious?

The best that money can buy, being XM193? Really?

There are people who think that the best ammo you can buy is XM193?

did you even read the thread?

 

[rhino]

This is... a lot of epeen waggin.

I couldnt care less what it is, reject, non reject... who cares.

Is it good ammo? if so.. shoot it. If not ... who the heck cares?

Agreed, but in my case I at least expect the terminal performance to match what I expect from M193-spec. That means a projectile the correct composition that will fragment at the expected impact velocities, etc.

If it's cosmetically different, who cares. In fact, I bought 2540 rounds of that Guatelmalan IMG M193 a few years ago that was so corroded most people didn't want to shoot it. I had one round in those two cases that did not fire, and the rest were good. In fact, they were a little hotter than most M193-spec I've shot, which I learned at the Kentucky State Multi-Gun chrono stage a few years ago.