Understandable then. Well it's unfortunate he is caught up in their policy. But that's a chance for an LGS to earn his business.
...until the ATF leans on the LGS and "suggests" that they change their policy to "fix the problem", too.
Understandable then. Well it's unfortunate he is caught up in their policy. But that's a chance for an LGS to earn his business.
Do you mean like using some of the Laws already in place??
How about making some more laws that we do NOT enforce????..Seems like that is the way it has worked for a LONG time...Bill.
I went shooting with a boss that was legally blind after he bought a pistol.
I've seen worse shooters.
I can make an argument that having an I.D. rather than a driver's license made you 4 times more likely to have arrived at the Rural King on a scooter.
...until the ATF leans on the LGS and "suggests" that they change their policy to "fix the problem", too.
I would think ATF would be leaning on Indiana BMV regarding the bogus state ID cards
No, the LGS are doing so on their own. Very few people, perhaps excepting pure Libertarians who want to demonstrate how bad *** they are to earn libertarian starburst points, want to willingly arm murderers.
How are they NOT bogus?The ID cards are not bogus.
The criminals are already armed. Regardless of what silly laws are put in place, they will continue to be. This policy may make Rural King feel good, and make their lawyers feel good (and collect a few more fees for the advice), but it won't change anything at all on the larger scale.No, the LGS are doing so on their own. Very few people, perhaps excepting pure Libertarians who want to demonstrate how bad *** they are to earn libertarian starburst points, want to willingly arm murderers.
So, do you need to get a new passport when you move to a new state? If not, it's not a good test of residency.Just out of curiosity I wonder how they would, or legally could, respond to someone presenting a United States Passport for purposes of identification?
It is my simple understanding that a US Passport must be accepted as identification under federal law. However, it is rarely used as such while in the states. It must be accepted as proper legal identification for voting.
Yet I doubt that many RK salesmen have ever had one presented, although it does contain all relevant information except the address. It includes state of residence and DoB.
Could it be turned down, legally?
Regards,
Doug
Could it be turned down, legally?
It's my understanding that an ffl is under no obligation to sell anyone a firearm.
They could even say that your santa hat is a bit gauche as we approach Memorial Day.