I would not only accept that, I'd likely compliment their savvy personal regard to "common-sense" fashion laws.
I would not only accept that, I'd likely compliment their savvy personal regard to "common-sense" fashion laws.
No, the LGS are doing so on their own. Very few people, perhaps excepting pure Libertarians who want to demonstrate how bad *** they are to earn libertarian starburst points, want to willingly arm murderers.
Really don't understand why RK is worried about it. You still have to pass the background check before you can leave the store with it. ATF needs to find the people doing the buying and selling, they got their info or the 4473 would not go through. That is why we have this system, Right?
On another note, I was in another local gun shop today.
The owner told me something of interest.
He's only been in the gun business for about 3 years, but he said if someone lists Illinois as their place of birth, they get delayed EVERY time!
Rural king has a very "zealous" consulting firm working for them to try to keep them out of trouble with the Feds. It is more than likely they who do the leaning....until the ATF leans on the LGS and "suggests" that they change their policy to "fix the problem", too.
Rural king has a very "zealous" consulting firm working for them to try to keep them out of trouble with the Feds. It is more than likely they who do the leaning.
I hate to say it but the problem IS guns, the guns the prosecutors, police and judges ignore, everytime a gang banger, dealer or whatever gets busted they need to turn them over to the feds and have these jerks prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. We already have prohibited person laws, straw purchase laws and other federal laws that give people the big hammer of federal prison. Stop 'cutting breaks' and turn them over to the feds already
Sounds to me more like local prosecutors, police and judges ignoring the crimes of criminals is the problem.
Quit asking for a distant centralized government to come deal with local problems, hold locals accountable to doing that.
Why would I want any federal gun laws?
What state gun crime was the gang banger that bought the AK at Bradis committing?
What state gun laws are the guys from Chicago buying duffel bags full of guns at Lafayette gun shops and gun shows committing?
What do you expect the Tippecanoe County Prosecuting Attorney to do about the Lafayette gun running to the gangs?
So, you want nothing done?
If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao . . .
If you think that doing nothing about criminal gunrunning is the best answer, you are going to lose that argument politically.
Tell me, what's it like to lose an argument?
You are not arguing, you are simply attempting to make libertarian starwood points.
The notion that .gov does not have a interest in disrupting the supply of guns to criminal gangs is a loser from the jump off.
A community regulates itself or regulations are imposed from the outside. Rural King's decision is understandable.
My notion is only a loser politically. Government interest in controlling and regulating everything we allow will always beat notions of independence and accountable liberty politically.
What does it feel like to lose a real argument, though, that's what I'm asking you to describe for me.