Man, this conversation has turned to !
Alternative take...
Whistleblower goes to House Dems. House Dems correctly say that's not how this works, and direct him/her to use the whistleblower process. Yes, Schiff lied about this sequence of events, that's something, but the actual events appear to be lawful otherwise. Though this will give the GOP some ammo.
What is the difference between a spy and a whistle blower?
What is the difference between a spy and a whistle blower?
What is the difference between a spy and a whistle blower?
What is the difference between a spy and a whistle blower?
What is the difference between a spy and a whistle blower?
A spy steals information that they have illegally accessed, and disseminates it to those who cannot legally possess said information.
A whistleblower (concerning this case), takes information that they have legally accessed, and disseminates it to the those who can legally possess said information.
What was your question rhetorical?
So we take your answer to its logical conclusion we first need to find out if the whistleblower was legally allowed to have the information, or not then he and those who he acquired it from should be arrested and charged...
The information in the whistleblower report was not the whistleblowers...
A spy steals information that they have illegally accessed, and disseminates it to those who cannot legally possess said information.
A whistleblower (concerning this case), takes information that they have legally accessed, and disseminates it to the those who can legally possess said information.
What was your question rhetorical?
Circling back to this case for a second, what do you call a person who conspires with a Congressman to create information that they had no first hand knowledge of and then disseminates it?
A dumocrap