Start with Joe Biden. We need to make sure it’s safe for elderly dementia sufferers.I like the way you think!
Start with Joe Biden. We need to make sure it’s safe for elderly dementia sufferers.I like the way you think!
Not yet. Can I have your guns?
Apparently, COVID isn't aware the election is over. Cases in Indiana continue to spike upwards to new highs.
Hospitalizations continue to rapidly rise with COVID ICU bed usage now at 27.8%, about 1/2 of all not used for other reasons ICU beds.
And, daily COVID deaths continue to rise with individual positivity approaching 20%, currently at 19.2%.
So, we've had a state level mask mandate since July 23, we're experiencing a spike in cases by more than 4x in the last 6 weeks, but we have nothing like the death spike you're seeing? So, why is that? Is Indiana doing something majorly wrong? Are Buckeyes just made of sterner stuff? Or could it be the map is not the territory
The counties in Indiana experiencing extremely high per capita new case counts are non-urban... where people don't wear masks hardly at all... so your mask mandate point is what? It would work or at least help if people did wear them?
[So, you think Ohio is completely urban and doesn't have any rural counties? Try again]
No idea about Ohio nor do I care... I don't live nor travel there... I have recently through Illinois, Missouri and Iowa and saw the same thing. In urban areas, almost universal mask wearing... in non-urban areas, almost universal zero masks. All have state mask "mandates".
[Ohio doesn't fit the preferred narrative so don't care. Got it! Doesn't explain the differences which means your neat explanations for events are anecdotal and not evidence based]
What is your point about mask mandates if swathes of the states ignore them? And that's where the preponderance of the spiking, the worst per capita new cases, is occurring... where the people are not wearing masks at all.
My point is there is obviously some variable to why and how people get infected that is not well understood and masking alone doesn't fit the data. Like 'climate science', it isn't science (or correct) if it can't explain the data and cannot be used to reliably predict future trends, it's just story time
Edit: In answer to your question, there is no point to mask mandates from an epidemiological standpoint. They are the ritual the shaman tells you will protect you from evil spirits
The counties in Indiana experiencing extremely high per capita new case counts are non-urban... where people don't wear masks hardly at all... so your mask mandate point is what? It would work or at least help if people did wear them?
No idea about Ohio nor do I care... I don't live nor travel there... I have recently through Illinois, Missouri and Iowa and saw the same thing. In urban areas, almost universal mask wearing... in non-urban areas, almost universal zero masks. All have state mask "mandates".
What is your point about mask mandates if swathes of the states ignore them? And that's where the preponderance of the spiking, the worst per capita new cases, is occurring... where the people are not wearing masks at all.
Apparently, COVID isn't aware the election is over. Cases in Indiana continue to spike upwards to new highs.
Hospitalizations continue to rapidly rise with COVID ICU bed usage now at 27.8%, about 1/2 of all not used for other reasons ICU beds.
And, daily COVID deaths continue to rise with individual positivity approaching 20%, currently at 19.2%.
No. based on not only cases but also Indiana's serologic surveys, no area is anywhere near herd immunityCould it be that in urban areas the CV has already killed the majority that it was going to kill thus no more spikes in death as the rest that get it can fight it off.
Vaccination is starting to look promising. If the Pfizer vaccine is effective, there is a good chance at least one of the others are also. So all we may have to do is avoid exposure for a few more months.Unless you get off planet CV is going to get you at some point.
No. based on not only cases but also Indiana's serologic surveys, no area is anywhere near herd immunity
Vaccination is starting to look promising. If the Pfizer vaccine is effective, there is a good chance at least one of the others are also. So all we may have to do is avoid exposure for a few more months.
And even if the vaccines don't pan out, this is NOT the time to be going to the hospital for Covid. Fatality rates and comorbidities will go up. They can't provide proper care when they are overworked.
No. based on not only cases but also Indiana's serologic surveys, no area is anywhere near herd immunity
Vaccination is starting to look promising. If the Pfizer vaccine is effective, there is a good chance at least one of the others are also. So all we may have to do is avoid exposure for a few more months.
And even if the vaccines don't pan out, this is NOT the time to be going to the hospital for Covid. Fatality rates and comorbidities will go up. They can't provide proper care when they are overworked.
Kentucky Dem Governor Andy Beshear gave this warning today. What an ass!
[FONT=&]"Those that you may think you may only have 5-10 Thanksgivings left with, if we're not careful this year, you might not have more than one," Beshear said.[/FONT]
That's happening now. People have been stuck in their houses, isolated, depressed, gaining weight, losing their livelihoods, becoming suicidal, etc.. How come medicines have to list every single remotely possible side effect, no matter how rare or unlikely, but the CDC and WHO get a pass on issuing a warning about the side effects of their "cure"?