To be fair, ads like that are why they took away the ratings that we used to be able to give in the classifides. While that wasn't the worst deal in the world, you certainly found a sucker.
FYI,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bj8Nk3p1wyY
Same old problem with Romney, which Romney do you believe?
Omg, did Mittens actually say "weapons of unusual lethality" in that clip?!?
Mitt: "Machine guns are and have always been illegal"
Realize that in SOME states machine guns ARE ILLEGAL. Mitt is from one of the states where machine have been illegal for many years.
imagine if he had gotten up and said they are LEGAL. the majority of voters whodon't know better wouldn't have been able to run faster enough to the polls to vote for Obama, their savior from guns.
Or maybe he could have said something that made sense.
He could have mentioned that the FBI's own data showed no measurable drop in crime rates due to the previous AWB. He could have pointed to the issue of Chicago's gun crime despite their strict gun laws that make it extremely difficult for citizens to own firearms for self defense. He could have said that if the economy is failing and such large numbers of people are unemployed, they are more likely to turn to crime.
Unless the Dems hold both houses...a new ban isn't going to happen.
Vote Romney...please.
It is not my first time to ask for it. I have taken some flack for it, but I stand by it. Would someone else be better, probably, but no one that actually has a chance this time, so Romney is my choice. I am not naive enough to say that everyone will agree with me. Some may do so with more passion, but on the 2nd ammendment alone (I would also go Constitution alone), our choice is clear. Other issues may be more or less.A gutsy statement to make on INGO....I wish I had the courage...Rep on the way. I am going to (with trepidation) give you a thumbs up and a salute...
So?
He's trying to become the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, not the President of Massachusetts. He should damn well know they AREN'T ILLEGAL everywhere, especially since he's trying to get that NRA voting base.
but on the 2nd ammendment alone (I would also go Constitution alone), our choice is clear.
Why bash Romney? He's not advocating any ban. Obama has just restated his support for a ban. Because of Romney's record of restrcitions and that it's a small issue to him and a bartering chip at the political table to be used for any other bigger goal that he has.
Which candidate's statement embodies the clear and present danger to your constitutional right to bear arms?
I don't hate you, but that statement above just shows how very little you've looked into Romney or understood what he said when he was talking about what a great thing his gun legislation as gov. was. If the second ammendment alone, was all you're concerned about then I would only ask that you dig deeper into Romney's record.
I don't have any hard feelings or hate, I just feel pity if you think Romney is your second ammendment champion.