View attachment 52200
0-60 4.2 seconds
1/4 mile 12.6 at 114
Top speed 182 mph
Sounds unbelievable
poor mans Hellcat !
Nice car!!!!!
View attachment 52200
0-60 4.2 seconds
1/4 mile 12.6 at 114
Top speed 182 mph
Sounds unbelievable
poor mans Hellcat !
Kinda makes my point about the V6 not being a slow car. Only 1/2 second difference in the passing time between the V6 and the GT? That's impressive. I see the Camaro does spank them both, though.
View attachment 52200
0-60 4.2 seconds
1/4 mile 12.6 at 114
Top speed 182 mph
Sounds unbelievable
poor mans Hellcat !
Actually, it makes BBI's point and not yours. Half a second means it takes the V6 22.7% longer than the V8 to do that passing test. Half a second is pretty big compared to the total amount of time (2.2 sec).
Nice! What kind of motor does it have?
Just as I suspected.
The Camaro is fast, that is until there is a corner.
Pedantically play with percentages all you want, but the fact of the matter is, a V6 Mustang that is only 1/2 second slower than a Mustang GT is impressive and fast.
That isn't saying much, 175-205 hp / 210-248 Lb torque, are not numbers to brag about.Lest we forget the SVO mustang of the mid 80s. That turbo 4 was faster than the v8....
I was trying to make the Ford guys feel bad....That isn't saying much, 175-205 hp / 210-248 Lb torque, are not numbers to brag about.
If you are talking mid 80' cars, lets not over look the 87 Buick Grand National GNX 376 hp / 360 Lb torque. Plus they look BAD ASS......
I do believe the GNX was the fastest American production car in 1987.
That's not hard to do.... Just need to enjoy something that's not a Corvette...You sir are correct.... Pissed off the Corvette guys
Figured out the autograph in the glove box with help from my salesman.
Matches up to JR Hildebrand:
I was looking at Nascar drivers, didn't think to look at Indy car.
Was he the owner, or did he just autograph it for the owner?