Coronovirus III

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,052
    113
    Was causation proved for nursing homes or was it correlation? We both agree they should be shut down it seems.

    What criteria would be acceptable for closing down nursing homes? Subways? etc. If we can't prove causation, what criteria are we to make decisions off of?

    Do you have well-enough controlled areas that implement different policies, to be able to analyze the variance? That's the hard part: there are often too many variables to try to control, and even quite a bit of overlap of impact of competing policies (the "Chicago gun crimes are caused by Indiana guns" canard).
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,908
    113
    Mitchell
    According to the plain reading (and a quick calculation) from the Indiana CV site, a little over 40% of the deaths occurred in long term care facilities. How many of the other 60% were residents of LTCs but died in hospitals, I wonder?
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    Then we don't have a need for a national disease bureaucracy. Or FEMA. Or the FBI. The governors can figure it out. :rolleyes:

    You probably didn't know this but some states have different levels of pandemic than other states. Wyoming with 7 deaths is different than New York with 21,640 deaths. So, Yes, the states need to set appropriate policies at that level if not even a finer level and the governors are the ones to do that.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    There was no/limited national guidance....and what was given was junk science and modeling. Demographics of large population centers and minorities happen to be coincident. You're telling me a republican governor could do better when the man in the White House doesn't know **** from shinola?

    Well, there was national guidance, from the CDC. Trump was an inarticulate spokesman for it, but there was guidance.

    In terms of actual policy and action, either party could've managed through this about the same way, IMHO. Trump became the headline himself too much, but that's pretty much his path.

    And it wasn't junk science. ;) The best science, like intel, doesn't always clear the path - it just points the direction.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    Then don't sit back and blame democrat governors for this mess.

    The GOP is in charge. If they failed to provide effective leadership, that's on you.
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,052
    113
    No one tends to be happy with the CDC, NIH, FEMA, FBI etc unless the actions they take are agreeable.

    Just look at the NRA and the GOA!

    McConnell is blaming Obama.

    Sheesh. Let's blame the guy who has been out of office since 2016, and not look at Mr. Schwepps.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,140
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I rarely ever quote pics, but this is important.

    THE REASON WE ARE GREEN IS THE QUARANTINE.

    Why would we have WANTED to be yellow or red?

    And YOU should understand that.

    Without the SIP order, we would've joined NY. Does anyone here actually want to be in the same boat as NY? Any boat that NY is in is a boat I don't want to be in.


    There is absolutely no scientific basis to make that claim. I'm not sure about the complete list but I believe the Dakotas, Nebraska and Iowa at least had no restrictions, and they're also in the green. Jamil's heat map is unclear without more context. It seems to indicate that hotspots are more about urbanization with spots only in Boise in ID and Cheyenne in WY but Utah has roughly the same number of deaths as Idaho and 10x the number of deaths in Wyoming yet shows no hotspots. What it does show is unclear but I don't believe it supports your case, either
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,140
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I want to see the data of NY without nursing homes, which Cuomo forced to take contagious patients back into the general population. There are going to be major lawsuits over that...

    On May 6 the WSJ reported that at least 4,968 confirmed and presumed deaths related to the novel coronavirus occurred at nursing homes and adult-care facilities

    That's around 18.5% of all NY state deaths. I haven't seen it broken down to the NYC area but its likely to be pretty awful and I expect Cuomo and de Blasio won't be very co-operative with anyone desiring to do such a breakdown
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,140
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Again, perfect data is an illusion in this reality.

    There's no denying the decisions were based on incomplete data, that's part of the problem with a novel virus: we don't know what we don't know.

    At the time the decisions were made, the actual deaths appeared to be (and likely were) growing exponentially. What that meant in terms of infections is unknown and likely unknowable. But, the actual math available was compelling.

    Then why leap from an admission that there is a great deal you don't know to a conclusion that the SIP orders were enormously helpful? On what basis?
     

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,638
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Then we don't have a need for a national disease bureaucracy. Or FEMA. Or the FBI. The governors can figure it out. :rolleyes:

    :rolleyes: Your statement is silly and not related to what was discussed but yes there's probably very little offered by the Fed Gov the states themselves couldn't handle if they had to.
     

    churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    OK folks this is mostly become a political discussion. Very little if any new or even pertinent info coming forth.

    So I will close this and the Political thread and start another all in thread. Coming to your area in a few minutes.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,140
    149
    Columbus, OH
    tenor.gif


    To be fair....to ask a governor to know epidemiology when so much disinformation is coming from Federal levels of expected competency....is, perhaps, a bit much.

    And the "democrat" is just ****ing gratuitous.

    So, what would be fair to expect of a president when so much disinformation, and information that was flat out wrong, was coming from the WHO and the CDC (and still is). When do the 'experts' get called to account for their sins (of both pride and omission)?
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom