I don't get any mailings or emails for money or products from NRA, but I get alerts from ILA regularly.
I have nothing against GOA, but your OP seemed argumentative, Gregr.
Yes, that is how mass mailings and fund raising work. If they were not effective, they would not transpire.
What on earth is GOA better at? GOA is invisible on Capitol Hill and in the states.
Give us example of GOA doing something better than NRA.
Gregr, I believe the intent of those asking why are merely curious, as am I, as to what your reasons are for feeling this way? There's no expectation of forcing you to justify your opinion, as you are entitled to it, but are curious as to what lead you to that opinion. See it as a chance to bring others around to your point of view and, possibly, add support for GOA!
Invisible based on what? Clearly you know nothing about GOA.
IMO. NRA has endorsed legislation in the past that was no friend to gun owners,
But in my opinion, GOA is much, much better than NRA because they are dug in, and don`t often compromise. But that`s just my opinion, not an assertion of any kind. Jeez.
Rather than just posting the alert, Gregr added a statement of fact, "GOA is head and shoulders above NRA."John Cornyn Introduces Concealed Carry Reciprocity in the Senate | Current Alerts
GOA is head and shoulders above NRA. Participate and take action.
GOA sends emails and mailers monthly, or oftentimes more frequently, in regards to legislation involving gun rights, and the only thing NRA sends is donation requests. I`m a Life-Endowment NRA member, and have been a member for more than 38 years, but IMO, GOA is head and shoulders better than NRA.
Argumentative? Not the intent at all. Stating my opinion is all. You could want to consider what in the world would let you read it to be argumentative...
How to communicate on INGO, lesson 4.
If you make a statement of fact, you will be question.
Example:
Rather than just posting the alert, Gregr added a statement of fact, "GOA is head and shoulders above NRA."
But, why? One can assume to promote the GOA. But rather than saying, "I prefer the GOA over the NRA", he chose to phrase it with a concrete statement of fact; there's no ambiguity here.
After the inevitable questioning, he couches his statement with, "IMO" (in my opinion):
Then he's perplexed at the INGO dogpile that was so clear to everyone else:
The lesson to be learned is to never state your opinion in such a way that the normative interpretation is that you are making a factual statement; especially on such issues where you are in the minority.
Again?
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo....html?highlight=so+much+for+freedom+of+speech
We are so dumb and immature and you are so adept and wise please forgive our ignorance oh great and powerful[STRIKE] OZ[/STRIKE] Gregr.
If you want to to avoid dog piles don't express your opinion as a challenge.