I don't know who is right or wrong in this case. I have yet to understand, in detail along with broad brush, exactly what the nature of the conflict is.
That said, I do have a serious concern on one (1) point: the length of time Mr. LaPierre has been in a position of power. He could be a GREAT guy, he could be a wonderful guy, but being in power since in the organization since 1991 seems way too long to me. I believe the same of politicians as well.
Over that length of time it can become a very corrupting, even for he best of people. Someone on the board knows a friend and invites them to run, then you have a friend, and friends of friends, and so on. Until no one is willing to see the severe faults in others because they're all friends.
Even if Mr. LaPierre is great at his job, so what? There are many people that could do as well but won't get the chance so long as he is there. And I do not mean to disparage him or his service at all. This applies in my mind to all organizations and groups. We let people get to the top, we get comfortable with them, then we get afraid of change.
Just because someone like Mr. LaPierre would, in my world, have faced a term limit would in no way stop his ability to contribute. Imagine his contribution as a voice inside a state civil liberties organization pushing the protection of the 2A! He would be great with the ACLU or as a writer for a major publication.
None of this means I support Oliver North! The Contras were terrorists, just terrorists the American Government preferred to the then current government. We have gotten into bed with slime on many occasions just to fight slime we don't like, and Col North was part of that. All that aside, he may well be in the right on this issue, or the wrong. I don't know.
Regards,
Doug
That said, I do have a serious concern on one (1) point: the length of time Mr. LaPierre has been in a position of power. He could be a GREAT guy, he could be a wonderful guy, but being in power since in the organization since 1991 seems way too long to me. I believe the same of politicians as well.
Over that length of time it can become a very corrupting, even for he best of people. Someone on the board knows a friend and invites them to run, then you have a friend, and friends of friends, and so on. Until no one is willing to see the severe faults in others because they're all friends.
Even if Mr. LaPierre is great at his job, so what? There are many people that could do as well but won't get the chance so long as he is there. And I do not mean to disparage him or his service at all. This applies in my mind to all organizations and groups. We let people get to the top, we get comfortable with them, then we get afraid of change.
Just because someone like Mr. LaPierre would, in my world, have faced a term limit would in no way stop his ability to contribute. Imagine his contribution as a voice inside a state civil liberties organization pushing the protection of the 2A! He would be great with the ACLU or as a writer for a major publication.
None of this means I support Oliver North! The Contras were terrorists, just terrorists the American Government preferred to the then current government. We have gotten into bed with slime on many occasions just to fight slime we don't like, and Col North was part of that. All that aside, he may well be in the right on this issue, or the wrong. I don't know.
Regards,
Doug