He may be one of my bosses, but he doesn't speak for me.Now the IMPD mouthpiece is parroting the same tired crap as Carter.
This was my rebuttalNow the IMPD mouthpiece is parroting the same tired crap as Carter.
It would've been nice if we had individuals come and say that in the committee hearings.He may be one of my bosses, but he doesn't speak for me.
Did you go to the hearings?It would've been nice if we had individuals come and say that in the committee hearings.
I did go to the Senate committee hearing, but to be fair to you I also didn't have any potential blowback from supervisors/bosses from my position or statements.Did you go to the hearings?
I understand they don't speak for line officers.This was my rebuttal
2022 Legislative Session Thread
So, it appears that the Governor still hasn't grown a pair. It's looking more and more like a late Friday afternoon dump. I guess he could just wait until Tuesday and keep his mouth shut. I still don't think he has the balls to veto the thing. If there’s any good news, no other bills that...www.indianagunowners.com
I'm not worried about blowback. I couldn't make it to the hearings.I did go to the Senate committee hearing, but to be fair to you I also didn't have any potential blowback from supervisors/bosses from my position or statements.
Who do you think is providing the IMPD talking head with his talking points? Holcomb, Hog or Both?I'm not worried about blowback. I couldn't make it to the hearings.
Who knows. Admin always have a groupthink attitude and are afraid to give a differing opinion for fear of losing their cushy positions.Who do you think is providing the IMPD talking head with his talking points? Holcomb, Hog or Both?
Not if his boss gave him permission.I would bet that Carter violated at least some ISP SOPs by testifying in uniform. Perhaps he should be held accountable for that.
Or orders to do so. Same thing, really, in this context.Not if his boss gave him permission.
I could be wrong as I am basing my response on info I had 20yrs ago and there have been changes to the criminal code etc. However, I don't think an individual carrying a gun is sufficient for police to investigate or even ask you if you are a proper person/legal to carry.I would think constitutional carry would be much easier for law enforcement. If a person has a gun and is not a proper person, simply arrest them. If they have a gun and are a proper person leave them alone.
|