Jim Irsay - Not a Friend of the 2nd Amendment

[steve666]

...by joining in on the mis-information band wagon, I've lost some respect for them.

I couldn't lose what I never had.

 

[ddenny5]

He is a pill popping junky that should have gone to federal prison. He bought his way out of the pokey when he got caught stashing thousands of pills on his private jet and running them to california.

He was the old Nora Apothecary's favorite customer. He ate pain meds like Pez candy and now he wants to tell me how to live?

Yeah, I am not a fan of Jim but I will not hold that against the team. There is a choice if you do not like that you cannot carry

 

[Hop]

Irsay tweet'd about buying an SKS and a bunch of ammo. Maybe he's not a gun hater.

Found it:

JimIrsay Jim Irsay



Stopped off n Tushka at the pop knife n gun place,bought a SKS rifle and a couple full cases of that steel core ammo,with the Berdan primers

6 Mar Favorite Retweet Reply


Maybe it's all about a perceived family safe environment or having to pay extra security at the gate. I think we should invite him to an INGO shooting event to change his mond on the subject.



[edit - I just invited him to come shootin' on Twitter. LOL]

 

[bwframe]

Irsay tweet'd about buying an SKS and a bunch of ammo. Maybe he's not a gun hater.

Stopped off n Tushka at the pop knife n gun place,bought a SKS rifle and a couple full cases of that steel core ammo,with the Berdan primers...

Callin' BS.
Those are song lyrics;
Choctaw Bingo
Choctaw Bingo lyrics by James McMurtry

 

[BBSparkle]

He cheats on his wife constantly. That's all I really know about him. I can't afford tickets to NFL games, anyway, so I don't really care if I can carry there or not.

 

[T.Lex]

Irsay got an exception, but SB292 passed.

I think that's called "scoreboard" for gun owners.

Plus... there's a confusing exception that might seriously dilute his exception.

 

[SemperFiUSMC]

I don't care about Irsay. I don't care about the Colts. They never play the Red Wings. As soon as they do I'll start to care.

What I do care about is property owners and their right to use, or have thier property used as they deem, not as some goverment asstard thinks it should be used. This law, while feeling good for gun guys, is an absolute assault on property owner rights. On principle it's wrong.

Any business owner should be able to decide whether smoking is or isn't OK on their property. Carrying a weapon is no different.

 

[femurphy77]

Irsay should be able to say he doesn't want guns in his (taxpayer funded) facility. I say I don't want my money in his (taxpayer funded) anti-gun facility. Simple enough.

 

[jedi]

I don't care about Irsay. I don't care about the Colts. They never play the Red Wings. As soon as they do I'll start to care.

What I do care about is property owners and their right to use, or have thier property used as they deem, not as some goverment asstard thinks it should be used. This law, while feeling good for gun guys, is an absolute assault on property owner rights. On principle it's wrong.

Any business owner should be able to decide whether smoking is or isn't OK on their property. Carrying a weapon is no different.

SB292 dealt with guns not smoking. In addition SB292 only deals with property that is "government owned" NOT private property. So PRIVATE PROPERTY owners do have a say of what is OK (guns, smoking, etc..) on their property.

 

[ryknoll3]

SB292 dealt with guns not smoking. In addition SB292 only deals with property that is "government owned" NOT private property. So PRIVATE PROPERTY owners do have a say of what is OK (guns, smoking, etc..) on their property.

This!

This bill has NO effect on private property. It doesn't even effect public property LEASED by a private party. This only effects taxpayer-owned and operated public property.

You might be more concerned about the parking lot bill. This has more of an effect on private property rights.

SB292 doesn't affect private property rights in the least.