Timjoebillybob
Grandmaster
- Feb 27, 2009
- 9,389
- 149
Don't necessarily see why it would. Heck that scum that shot several people in the store a year or two ago didn't.I hope this doesn't change Kroger's gun friendly policy.
The per capita rate stat doesn't really reflect a city's crime magnitude IMO. I mean compare us to Chiraq, demographic, not even close. I still consider the actual amount of deaths rather than rates as a litmus test.
I'll agree and disagree. A lot depends on who/what you are comparing. For example in the last 15 yrs or so where I live the murder rate in 2 years was around 38/100k, the rate in the other years was iirc 0. In those 2 years two people were killed. The per capita rate for those 2 years doesn't reflect the crime magnitude for my town simply because of the size/rarity of murders here. Now comparing petty theft with other towns around me might be more accurate.
On this I would politely disagree in part. Otherwise comparing absolute criminal homicides doesn't mean much. One needs to ask how the per capita numbers are measured: metropolitan area or the city proper. The FBI keeps track of both for metro areas. What I would agree with is the need to dig deeper into the demographics of the murders, and not purely by race, but more by gang involvement and economic class as I believe those are the real drivers. As an aside, Indianapolis is considered one of the higher criminal homicide rates in the nation in the top 20-25. This was shocking when I discovered it. The figures I've seen show it in the top ten for violent crime; the criminal homicide numbers belie this. Chiraq, while perhaps the closest is actually safer than St. Louis, Cleveland or Detroit. Cincinnati also has major problems. The worst is probably East St. Louis, but it isn't usually listed as it doesn't have a population in excess of 200k-250k.
John
I pretty much agree. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that Cago is safer than the others, a lot depends on what area you are in in each city. And how well you know the places to avoid. As an example Indy a couple of years ago had iirc 3 or 4 out of the top 10 most dangerous neighborhoods in the US. And yes E. St. Louis is a hell hole, Gary IN doesn't get listed either and I'd say it's pretty close to E St. Louis. But I'd have felt safer there simply because I knew where to avoid.