but again if they don't investigate and it happens, we are all over them for not doing their job. As much as I despise them they are in a pickle with people like us. They cannot win. But doing dumb things like a no-knock at 6am on a 70yo man isn't the smartest move either.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
More FBI Shenanigans
- Thread starter Expat
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Investigating is not knocking down the door at 6AM. It is knocking on the door and talking. If dude gets violent, then he has it coming.
Some are all over them for failing up front, I'm not one of them. I know the people that do bad stuff are a small fraction of the idiots that spout off about it.
I think until there is more info
manifest destiny
Master
Why did this guy's threats go to the front of the line for execution via no-knock warrant? There must be thousands of threats against potus each and every day on the internet.
Needing something in the news to hide something else
What crime, specifically, did he commit with this post? And what specific threat is communicated, to what specific person?
Who here made such an argument?
Legitimate question: Do you think he should have at least been interviewed to determine his level of severity? Or should he have been ignored?
I repeat: why is the range of options limited to: a) do nothing, and b) no-knock raid and execute?
I'm fairly certain I've answered this question, and been very clear about my opinion, in this thread. Of course such threats need to be taken seriously and appropriately investigated.
Which of my comments implied that I think he or his threats should have been ignored?
Seems like to me a couple guys in suits walking up to him in the grocery store and letting him know that "they need to talk about some of his FB posts" would've been a much better option. Why didn't the Secret Service do this? Too busy covering for Hunter? Too many out with dog bites? Too much time in Delaware?
Pretty sure most initial investigations are done by locals.
I don't think the SS has enough resources to check on every single threat.
I think (THINK) that they only go further when locals report on it.
David Koresh could have been picked up on one of his trips into town as well. That is not the object of the exercise though. The real object is the unbrideled exercise of government violence as a warning to those who might be willing to resist the regime.
Picking up Koresh quietly wouldn't have gotten the media spectacle, nor demonstrate the governments willingness to murder women and children by inferno to prove a point.
Picking up Koresh quietly wouldn't have gotten the media spectacle, nor demonstrate the governments willingness to murder women and children by inferno to prove a point.
Robert LaVoy Finicum approves of this post
Stop strawmanning this. If you'd drop the emotions for a moment and actually read what I've been posting, you'd see how ludicrous this statement is.
Here's my original statement, I feel you stopped reading it when you got to something you didn't like:
again, drop the emotion. I was asking a legitimate question to clarify your position. But you need to stop the strawman ****. I think if you'd take a breath, go back and read through what I've said REPEATEDLY you'd see we probably agree more than not.
