Why stop there? Why not have a license to vote that requires a civics and basic economics training? (This is how government works, This is where all that .gov money they spend comes from and it isnt free money, what causes inflation, national debt, etc.)I voted no, but am curious why to draw the line LTCH? Why not a requirement to purchase? You don't have to be a carrier to have an ND. Most people don't even carry.
Well said.We had safety checks in the 60’s for cars mechanical condition. It was abused. Texas had training requirements to get a gun. I saw that abused. All these rules and programs are reactive. Meaning stupid people would be legislated to normalcy. This is abused every single day as we keep proving that you cannot legislate stupidity. We have texting laws. Not working. We have drivers training. Does not eliminate bad drivers.
We have work ethics. Abused.
We call this a clue as it is a people problem that bleeds over and affects the responsible person with more laws.
Another reason for me voting no to training mandates is I have seen thousands of “trainees” that “learned” nothing or worse.
Face it. People = Good, Bad, Evil, and Dangerous.
CYA and try to forge ahead by turning the poor gun handlers around. Save the ones you can. Distance the ones you can’t.
And more bacon please.
See you on the range
Trapper
Just think militaryAs if training means someone won't have a ND.
I did the same. It worked wonders.I always told my boys that if I was ever looking down the wrong end of their gun the beating would commence, without a spoken word
Technically I've had a ND. And I have had LOTS of training:As if training means someone won't have a ND.