New Jersey: Possession of ‘High Capacity’ Magazines a Fourth Degree Felony Start

[jedi]

[video=youtube_share;O5IYKMalBEU]https://youtu.be/O5IYKMalBEU[/video]
sums it up best here. especially the part where the founding fathers had just spent the past 2 years at war.

 

[BigRed]

Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.


Keep it in mind before it is caved into your chest, you bastards of *****es.

 

[Dead Duck]

But I don't have any "High Capacity Magazines".
I only have the ones that came with the gun.

 

[blue2golf]

Problem is, the Democrat Party desperately wants to impose this nationwide. They did it with Obamacare and won't have an issue making criminals out of all of us.

For them, it's a twofer. It imprisons millions of conservative voters, enabling them to win more elections, plus it enfeebles our ability to physically resist them should it come to a shooting situation.

 

[Spear Dane]

Problem is, the Democrat Party desperately wants to impose this nationwide. They did it with Obamacare and won't have an issue making criminals out of all of us.

For them, it's a twofer. It imprisons millions of conservative voters, enabling them to win more elections, plus it enfeebles our ability to physically resist them should it come to a shooting situation.

You are only enfeebled if you don't have them. For instance if you suffered a tragic ice fishing accident and lost them all. That would be sad.

 

[Mongo59]

So, who knew grandad's tube fed .22 would put you in the clinker?

What if it only holds 10 .22lr but they find .22 shorts in your possession?

Does a 10 round mag with 1 in the pipe put you over the limit?

I am sure there will be no subjectivity imposed here, lol.

Don't worry guys and gals, if we vote the way they want us to we will all get 40 acres and a mule...

 

[jedi]

the ironic and sad part is this is coming from one of the ORIGINAL 13 colonies who shed blood for the very same freedom is now chooses to remove.

 

[Clay Pigeon]

The Bergen County prosecutor put out a memo recently that says off-dutyLEOs are no longer allowed to carry "high capacity magazines" and are subject to arrest. I would imagine the same goes for retired. So, you got that equality you were wanting.

True equality would be everyone has to use 10 rounders, even on duty officers.
LE shouldn't have extra rights.

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

True equality would be everyone has to use 10 rounders, even on duty officers.
LE shouldn't have extra rights.

I'm comforted to see that you would rather have rights taken away from some than given to all.

 

[Clay Pigeon]

I'm comforted to see that you would rather have rights taken away from some than given to all.

What would be need or reasoning for certain classes of citizens that work in LE to have extra rights over all other citizens?

 

[actaeon277]

I'm comforted to see that you would rather have rights taken away from some than given to all.

I think he would just rather not have rights for some, and not for all.
I could be wrong, but maybe he wants us to have the same rights... as in there being no silly limit of 10.

Which, I bet in 10 years there will be motions to decrease it to some lesser number.

 

[Mongo59]

You know, if this trend continues the people of New York may be allowed something scarier than a plastic spork to eat with...

 

[actaeon277]

While some claim "carve outs" for LEO because they're "trained", I don't believe that's true.
Cause then they could make carve out's for "trained" non-LEOs.

If you tell LEOs that they will be limited to 10 rounds, and they may be against the bill.
Make a carve out, and many (not all) will be okay with it, as long as "they" have their carve out.
Kinda of like non-LEOs that are okay with a gun control law, as long as "they" aren't affected.
It's not a LEO occurrence, it's a "people" occurrence. (Such as non-AR people being okay with banning ARs).

 

[Dead Duck]

10 round limits?
You might as well ban donuts.

 

[Mongo59]

Well if you "carve out" ex-military the Department of Homeland Security will have kittens. They are as loving and forgiving as Joseph Stalin and have their hand in everything.

FYI, we put an elevator in our church a few years back, it took longer than expected. Know why? We had to wait on an inspection from Homeland Security.

I feel more secure already.

When they investigate the fires in California at least they can say, "well we know it wasn't that elevator in that church in New Albany..."

 

[Route 45]

What would be need or reasoning for certain classes of citizens that work in LE to have extra rights over all other citizens?

Police carry and use of firearms has nothing to do with their "rights." It has to do with their statutory authority.

I strongly favor no magazine capacity restrictions for anybody, but this question is about as silly as asking why certain classes of citizens in the military have special "rights" to have automatic weapons.

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

What would be need or reasoning for certain classes of citizens that work in LE to have extra rights over all other citizens?

I don't believe LE should have "extra rights." But I would rather those "extra rights" be given to everyone than taken away from LE. Contrary to your personal feelings about LE, the vast majority of us don't want to see rights taken away form anyone, especially law-abiding citizens.

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

I think he would just rather not have rights for some, and not for all.
I could be wrong, but maybe he wants us to have the same rights... as in there being no silly limit of 10.

Which, I bet in 10 years there will be motions to decrease it to some lesser number.

I believe non-LE should have the same rights as LE when it comes to weapons. But taking those rights away from LE aren't going to do anything to give them to non-LE.

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

Police carry and use of firearms has nothing to do with their "rights." It has to do with their statutory authority.

I strongly favor no magazine capacity restrictions for anybody, but this question is about as silly as asking why certain classes of citizens in the military have special "rights" to have automatic weapons.

And grenade launchers, and tanks, and night vision, and Predator drones. What makes them so special that I can't have all that?

 

[actaeon277]

I believe non-LE should have the same rights as LE when it comes to weapons. But taking those rights away from LE aren't going to do anything to give them to non-LE.

I think we are agreeing.