Revolver Novice - Advice Wanted. But

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,937
    113
    The Ruger's are tough as nails - I love mine - but BOTH the Ruger and the S&W are over-engineered to safely shoot the hottest factory ammo.

    So...sort of. It's not that a factory load will blow up a given gun, that's why SAAMI specs exist. It's how many they'll handle. To quote Wayne Dobbs:

    I love the Model 19 myself and found that it's lighter weight and seemed to be fast handling. As a very young (21 YOA) cop, I carried and shot one a lot. It became obvious very quickly that shooting lots of Magnum ammo in the gun was very hard on it from the endshake, timing and forcing cone wear imparted. When you get a clue about the 19, you realize it's a .38 Special you can shoot a few Magnums through, but not many. Bill Jordan, the father of the Combat Magnum (the real name for the gun), said that from the start.

    So your "golden era" revolvers certainly had a durability difference with hot loads. The Ruger Six series were stouter than the equivalently sized k-frame, but the k-frame trigger was quite a bit better. N-frames held up to magnum loads much better, but even then on the big bores Ruger held an edge. S&W introduced the Endurance package to address some of that difference. Now, again, this isn't about modern production revolvers. That's not where my interest lies and I'm not the guy to ask. BossHoss, Denny at Sand Burr, those guys are the ones I'd listen to if I were to want a modern production S&W.

    What you see with "Ruger only" loads in loading manuals is cartridges that exceed SAAMI spec. Often considerably. .45 Colt's SAAMI spec is pretty low because it needs to be safe to fire in Colt SAA guns. A Super Redhawk will withstand pressures greatly exceeding what a Colt SAA will. So you end up with "Ruger only" loads. That doesn't mean *any* Ruger will withstand them. You can blow up a New Vaquero with loads a Super Blackhawk will happily take a steady diet of. So, you have to know what you're loading for. As a general rule of thumb "Ruger only" for big bore revolvers means Redhawk, Blackhawk, and the Super versions of each. Then you get "Super Redhawk only" loads.
     

    Areoflyer09

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Feb 28, 2017
    4,637
    38
    Indianapolis
    You could buy one (or two or three) while you're there.

    Ha! I’m not gonna hold my breath. While the wife has encouraged several purchases of mine and her own, I don’t think I’ll get away with buying soon. She may surprise me, but I’m not gonna bank on it. Something about my bday present being over budget. Dunno how that happened. :D
     

    PaulKersey

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Sep 16, 2012
    209
    18
    Evansville
    Since carry is not the priority, I'm another vote for the GP-100 (of any flavor). The Match Champion is certainly a nice gun, but the plain jane GP-100 is still awesome. Along with others who have posted in this thread, I prefer Rugers over S&W from a strength perspective. However, if you buy a Ruger, I would get a stainless model, as I have seen uneven bluing on the GP line.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,937
    113
    On the subject of the Match Champ/Performance Center options, are they worth the extra cost?

    I can't answer for the performance center, but for the Match Champion I'd say yes. Looking at Tombstone Tactical, there's about a $90 spread between the vanilla 4" GP100 and the MC.

    I kind of wish I didn't check. Now I know this exists: https://www.tombstonetactical.com/catalog/ruger/1774-gp100-revolver-357-mag-2-5in-7rd-stainless/

    A 7 shot 2.5" GP100 with compact grips. Kinda want.
     

    mcapo

    aka Bandit
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Mar 19, 2016
    20,721
    149
    East of Hoosier45 - West of T-dogg
    Worth/Value etc. is subjective. I find the S&W Performance Center Revolvers "worth" the extra cost but I am also the type that forgets what he paid for something the second its bought.

    Is the S&W "worth" the extra cost? To me it is, for a slightly better finished gun but I wouldn't hesitate to buy a Ruger....as a said in a early post; Ruger has a great price to value ratio.

    https://www.tombstonetactical.com/catalog/ruger/1774-gp100-revolver-357-mag-2-5in-7rd-stainless/ - That is very nice!
     

    MindfulMan

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Feb 14, 2016
    17,866
    113
    Indiana

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,937
    113
    Hey....I still have the ad open trying to think of reason that I "need" one...what's fair is fair...

    I-try-not-to-sound-like-Gollum-when-I-talk-about-jewelry-I-love-but-sometimes-its-unavoidable..jpg


    Not the one I wanted, but profanity filter wouldn't let the other link display correctly.
     
    Top Bottom