Agreed. There is no sense in it, especially if he can pick up that Ruger for $500.
1. Agreed. It is b/c of the price compared to everything else I've seen, and Ruger being a top-tier name, by my sense of reading.
2. I don't want to buy it now, but b/c of price, I must.
Even though it is above my usual price point (+/- $300) for quick resale, even I will buy the proverbial
"$1000 gun for $500" or even the $2000 gun for $1500, but I don't have the knowledge to do so at this point, which is why I ask.
I probably ought to pm certain individuals I have confidence in their knowledge and they know me well enough not to recommend something to me on the level of $100,000 car that is above my $25,000 school-teacher waiting for retirement tastes.
3. There are some CZ and Sig guns that make me wonder if I'm on the right track with sticking with my perceived "Toyota Corolla" tier of guns,
but Smith and Wesson has been good to me, which are most of mine with a Ruger GP100 22LR in the mix ($600 + tax) along with the hated Taurus name (but I had to get that 22 magnum SS monster of a revolver 2 weeks ago, and if I can never sell it b/c of it being a Taurus: lesson learned).
4. I wanted to buy a SS 38 special Taurus revolver for only $250 this week from a member here, but after research and reading of people's issues: I didn't: risky).