I can see merit in the argument, especially due to a lot of semi's requiring you to pull the trigger to release the slide. But again if a person I so careless as to not check the chamber before pulling a trigger, would they not also be just as careless with a revolver they "thought" only had empties in it?
Safety is wholly dependent on the person handling the gun.
I can't see why a glock 43 wouldn't be able to sit in stasis for 15 years and not be able to be fired on the first trigger pull. The modern magazine spring steel should not degrade if it is not being worked. The glock should be as reliable as the revolver coming out of deep storage.
Answered your own question. Bolded.
.
If I think the person I'm making a recommendation to is incapable of clearing a semi auto, I'm not recommending a firearm to them.
BBIs forced to me surrender to his revolver message a few months ago. The logic is inescapable and we all know that most people are NOT going to train. When you're right your right and if you're not going to do anything with your pistol aside from use it for a security blanket the revolver is the best choice because the untrained is less likely to have an ND while playing with it. If you plan on learning to use it for it's intended purpose a semi-auto is easier to shoot accurately, carry, and holds more ammunition. Imagine that, a former detective beating me up with logic and facts.Not so sure your buddy Mas would agree with you on that.
Joking aside, you might be starting to wear me down with this argument. Most people who carry a gun aren't serious about it. Most gun confrontations are ended without a shot fired. Most "accidents" happen when administratively handling a firearm. Why not a revolver.
So what real advantage other than nostalgia does a revolver have over a comparable quality semi auto carry pistol?
The advantage I see is not everyone has the physical strength to rack the slide of a semi auto pistol.
I get your point but for argument's sake...
My 5-4 100lb wife could barely rack the slide (but could) when we first got into guns. With a few pointers toward technique, she did so much easier. two years later she has no trouble. 5 minutes teaching the right technique the first time and it'll stick.
On the other hand (literally), she has a b**** of a time with a trigger past 8lb because she just doesn't have the strength in her finger. she can do it but the target better be within 3yds because the gun's all over the place from straining so hard to pull the trigger. In this context, a nice revolver with a trigger job to reduce the pull to something more manageable doesn't really work because most people looking for a sock-drawer gun aren't going to put that kind of money into it.
As for lube and lint, an unlubed semi-auto still runs for a while and a revolver can rust inside even if the outside is kept up. Neglect is the enemy of any mechanism.
Your wife has 5" of height on mine. She could rack the slide on my 1911 once we worked on technique a little but she could not pull the 12 lb trigger on my snub nose. After I smoothed it up some and got it to around 10 lbs, she could but she still preferred the auto.
Disclaimer: she does not carry. She just shoots a few rounds when she occasionally goes to the range with me.