Wow, I do apologize, Kut. You're NOT what I called you earlier, nor do you have a chip on your shoulder. You're just a fraud and a troll. I will now consider all of your postings in their proper context.
You're going to have a fun four to eight years ain't you Kut....
You have no idea, Indi..... Lol, buckle up boys. "what's good for the goose..."
It's not....It just seems a little early....I do believe that Trump is going to do a lot of good and surprise many folks (that seems to be his forte) and I had hoped folks would give him a chance....Like I said Kut, you bring up a mirror and show it to us...As I have also said it's kind of like a fun house mirror to the extent that the reflections are not always who we actually are...
But it's close enough that I can see my reflection in it every now and again......
I like what you bring to the table and although I may disagree with you I will never shut you out or put a blanket over the mirror you raise....
Plus I think you are actually a pretty conservative guy.....Most posts you make seem to come with a built in question mark...It's subtle but it's there.....
Damn you Indi.... ok, if it's a little early, I guess I can wait until he actually takes office. I'll try... and please note I said "try," to hold off 'til then. But if does something completely off the wall, I won't be able to help myself.
So it's now President Donald J. Trump. He gets a clean slate. He starts out with a 100% approval rating from me. However, as his presidency continues, I will rate his actions. It may go down, it may go up (if less than 100), but I will explain why he loses or gains points. I figure this is the best way to do this rather than post numerous individual threads about his presidency. Good natured debate is welcome, bad natured debate is not, and if pervasive without moderator intervention, I'll simply go back to my original plan and post a bunch of "Trump" threads.
Other member's ratings are welcome.
Oh, you said assets... never mind.Kutinup is consistent. I dont see any "gotcha" moment from reading that post. I do find the internet stalking of one of INGO's assets and a genuine good guy somewhat troubling. Not saying it's wrong, it's a free country. But creepy yea.
me and Kut have had some heated debates but I like him.
While I have disagreed wit Kut as much as anyone, I am unclear how this demonstrates trolling or hypocrisy. Feel free to educate me.
I think threadjacking is a team sport, and, frankly, your team let you down.I was attempting to thread jack it back towards the direction of the subject, which of course is "shots fired at truck with MAGA flag on I 465". Same interstate, same side of town, MAGA flags, INGOers, OC, 1A and 2A. Obviously my thread jacking talent isn't what it used to be.
Certainly on my Mount Rushmore of Threadjacking.I've always thought KellyinAvon was a great threadjacker
While I have disagreed wit Kut as much as anyone, I am unclear how this demonstrates trolling or hypocrisy. Feel free to educate me.
Trolling
The art of deliberately, cleverly, and secretly pissing people off, usually via the internet, using dialogue. Trolling does not mean just making rude remarks: Shouting swear words at someone doesn't count as trolling; it's just flaming, and isn't funny. Spam isn't trolling either; it pisses people off, but it's lame.
The most essential part of trolling is convincing your victim that either a) you truly believe in what you are saying, no matter how outrageous, or b) give your victim malicious instructions, under the guise of help.
Trolling requires decieving; any trolling that doesn't involve decieving someone isn't trolling at all; it's just stupid. As such, your victim must not know that you are trolling; if he does, you are an unsuccesful troll.
I think threadjacking is a team sport, and, frankly, your team let you down.
Michael Jordan still needed Scottie Pippen and some random 3rd guy to win. He couldn't do it on his own.
You may be the Michael Jordan of threadjacking (that's probably a thread jack of its own), but you can't do it on your own.
Is he arguing to advance and support a deeply held viewpoint, or is he arguing to get back at us because we failed to appreciate Obama to his satisfaction? Is he arguing to convince or to get some of his own back?
If I want to argue just for the sheer aerobic exercise, I'll patronize an ATM thread. Motivation makes the difference
From: Urban Dictionary: trolling
[emphasis mine]
Dude.I didn't know I was supposed to pick a team. Can we have do-overs?
I didn't know I was supposed to pick a team. Can we have do-overs?
All I'm gonna say about this is there seems to be a bit of that going on with both sides.
I've been married a long time.I heard T.Lex once threadjacked ten times in one day. Just to see if he could.
I appreciate the vote of confidence. I changed teams on Saturday, I got flipped off more on the Eastside team.Certainly on my Mount Rushmore of Threadjacking.