If Fenway (aka Boss Man) wants Que to be a mod then Que will be a mod.It's how it works.
INGO is not a democracy, it's a privately owned website.
If Fenway (aka Boss Man) wants Que to be a mod then Que will be a mod.It's how it works.
INGO is not a democracy, it's a privately owned website.
Why did you choose to start this poll after all this time has expired? Could'nt get it off your mind after 3 months?I did not know a poll was created then deleted. Nor would I be offended if this one was deleted. If we can't have a civil discussion shame on us. I'm not automatically the bad guy for starting the poll. It's what the members do with it.
Why did you choose to start this poll after all this time has expired? Could'nt get it off your mind after 3 months?
Fair question, maybe you should have asked it fairly instead of rhetorically, though. I'm an honest person. I decided to post the poll because of the other thread I mentioned in the OP.
And yes, I think pointing out inconsistencies in how threads are moderated and how rules are enforced can be constructive. Sadly, a bunch of rabble-rousers jumping in with popcorn boxes and IBTL are NOT constructive.
Neither is the dull axe you're looking to grind after you've been carrying it around for 3 months. I think this is a personal unresolved issue between yourself and Que that you wish to re-hash and get other members to back your play by voting in the poll you've created. JMO.Fair question, maybe you should have asked it fairly instead of rhetorically, though. I'm an honest person. I decided to post the poll because of the other thread I mentioned in the OP.
And yes, I think pointing out inconsistencies in how threads are moderated and how rules are enforced can be constructive. Sadly, a bunch of rabble-rousers jumping in with popcorn boxes and IBTL are NOT constructive.
So. . . You don't like popcorn!Fair question, maybe you should have asked it fairly instead of rhetorically, though. I'm an honest person. I decided to post the poll because of the other thread I mentioned in the OP.
And yes, I think pointing out inconsistencies in how threads are moderated and how rules are enforced can be constructive. Sadly, a bunch of rabble-rousers jumping in with popcorn boxes and IBTL are NOT constructive.
Keep it constructive, folks.
Simple question, asked by Que himself in Permalink #302 in this thread:
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/break-room/360423-woman-beheaded-oklahoma-co-worker.html
I don't envy the moderators' positions here on INGO, they volunteer for a difficult job. However, I do think their jobs become even more difficult when they become emotionally involved in the discussions they moderate. The INGO rules give moderators absolute power to censor or ban users (temporarily or permanently). Such censorship or banishment is supposed to be for infractions of a small number of clearly defined rules.
Unfortunately, the rules are not enforced impartially or consistently as evidenced by this thread being allowed to run its course for over five months now despite the core topic being clearly against the INGO rules:
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/general-political-discussion/355113-look-islamic-state.html
For the record, I am abstaining from this vote because I received a two-week ban for my comments in Permalink #60 of the "beheading" thread referenced above.