Let Wal Mart's lawyers argue with South Bend's lawyers.
I think state law trumps any agreement the city and Wal Mart have.
I go there almost everyday. In fact, most Walmart all the time, I drive a lot for my job. I am not sure what people are talking about by assault weapons. What does that mean? They have a Stevens 12 gauge, with a hand grip stock but it is no different than the other 12 gauges. Actually I think that only holds 6 rounds. I saw on the news one of the counselman was talking about .223 going through a bullet proof vest. These guys have know idea what they are talking about. Some people go by looks, the gun looks mean so it is an assault rifle.
The other fact is, your not talking about criminal posession your talking about law abiding tax payers that get a background check. There is know distintion between the two accourding to the common counsel.
I think state law trumps any agreement the city and Wal Mart have.
That is covered in 292 chapter 11.1 local regulation of firearms which covers what type of firearms etc. So what the South Bend council is doing is illegal to regulate at the local level. I just saw a sign last night in the firearm section about the local ordinance which is actually illegal. So is telling them what type of firearms they can sell. I wonder if Walmart knows that?
If you dig through this thread, I posted up an email that I sent to WalMart's attorney. Evidently, they could care less.
Link?That is covered in 292 chapter 11.1 local regulation of firearms which covers what type of firearms etc. So what the South Bend council is doing is illegal to regulate at the local level. I just saw a sign last night in the firearm section about the local ordinance which is actually illegal. So is telling them what type of firearms they can sell. I wonder if Walmart knows that?
I think he may be talking about a link to the local ordinance that was mentioned.I think he wanted the link to where wal-mart said it did not care.