.
Secession anyone?
Go ahead.
.
Secession anyone?
Secession anyone?
Sales tax increase. I'd settle for 10%+ if property tax disappeared, permanently.
Because the CSA had no taxes?
Throw in the income tax and I'm with ya.
Just for the record property taxes existed in 14 of the 15 states in 1796. A great many of the founding fathers were still alive, and would have been paying said taxes.
So to say it goes beyond their thinking of liberty, would be a stretch.
I'll play devil's advocate: you make a choice when you decide to buy or accept ownership of property. Before buying the property, you know that you will be taxed based on the value of the property. Nobody forces you to purchase. Nobody forces you to retain ownership. It is a choice, as a citizen, you make of your own free will.
You could just as easily choose to rent. Of course the taxes in the property is included in the rent somewhere. But when your contract terminates, you may up and leave without any further obligation. If you do not like the way your taxes are spent in a jurisdiction, you may vote with your feet and take up residence rather easily.
Now, having said all that, it sucks that if you own a piece of property, it can be taken from you should you be unable to pay your taxes. But maintaining even a small government costs money and everybody will always have an excuse for why they shouldn't be taxed.
Its not really a problem of the type of tax its the amount....
It would be really nice if we could cap our politicians at the average our military men and women make. Takes a small burden off the taxpayers, and discourages people from becoming career politicians unless they're really in it to serve the people.
Really, what other job field can you vote to raise your own pay?
Social Security and Medicare are federal not state.
My point is that I'm an advocate of straight consumption taxes... across the board
Tennessee has had the solution for years-9.75 % sales tax and no property tax. Could this work for Indiana
The notion that the state can take your property if you fail to pay a protection fee is ludicrous.
The tenant this country was founded on was property rights.
We're all slaves. I mean that literally. We must pay the masters for the house our land sits on, we must give them our wages and labor, we cannot buy or sell without paying them.
and they say slavery was abolished... LOL!
Seems to me that the State has stolen our personal property rights out from under us by the imposition of the real estate tax.
With that tax, we never really "own" our property outright, even if we no longer have a loan, because we have an ongoing tax obligation. Don't pay your real estate taxes and eventually your property gets seized, sold and your taxes are paid. You may get what's left over (if any) but you are without your property. You can't even opt-out of the services provided via the taxes.
These rights were taken without a whimper, without a 'shot' fired (so to speak).
Your thoughts?
The notion that the state can take your property if you fail to pay a protection fee is ludicrous.
The tenant this country was founded on was property rights.
We're all slaves. I mean that literally. We must pay the masters for the house our land sits on, we must give them our wages and labor, we cannot buy or sell without paying them.
and they say slavery was abolished... LOL!
Trust me.... I know.
My point is that I'm an advocate of straight consumption taxes... across the board.
The taxing of one's labor and one's property is bull****.
OK, then I'm with ya.
No income, no property and above all NO CAPITAL GAINS TAX.
As long as we avoid the Tennessee tax on ammo, I with you fellers.
I've commented on this numerous times here...in a nutshell, it is neo-feudalism.
Property "owners" pay tribute in return for "protection plus" from their liege, and do so in perpetuity. If ever you should fail to deliver your tribute (no matter how long ago you completed the "purchase" of the property), the real owners will arrive, with lethal force if deemed necessary, to throw you off "your" land and "sell" it to another.
The manner of paying for schooling, constitutionally mandated or not, is immaterial to a clear description of the state of affairs relative to property taxes.