Testing photo post skills

[Hatin Since 87]

I can agree with that. I'd also submit that Jiff Extra Crunchy would need to be added to the materials list.

I fell in love with crunchy peanut butter while sitting in a tree stand freezing my ass off. It was the most delicious sandwich ever, now that’s all I’ll buy. Anything else isn’t peanut butter

 

[marvin02]

I can agree with that. I'd also submit that Jiff Extra Crunchy would need to be added to the materials list.

Extra crunchy is pretty much best for most peanut butter uses. I use it to make peanut butter fudge.

 

[2A-Hoosier23]

 

[mbkintner]

I fell in love with crunchy peanut butter while sitting in a tree stand freezing my ass off. It was the most delicious sandwich ever, now that’s all I’ll buy. Anything else isn’t peanut butter

...

Extra crunchy is pretty much best for most peanut butter uses. I use it to make peanut butter fudge.

Just to be clear here JIFF Extra Crunchy...it must be JIFF. If given the choice between JIFF plain or <insert any other brand> Extra Crunchy the correct answer is JIFF.

 

[2A-Hoosier23]

Nice, seems to be working on both desktop and mobile for me. Pic taken in India for anyone curious (Taj Mahal). Not sure what kind of AK

 

[maxwelhse]

@mbkinter - that drawing is obviously wrong - no PBJ is properly made without overflow to lick off your fingers and get everything sticky.

That section view actually does appear to be wrong (I don't think it's projected accurately) and item balloons that are vertically out of order with a BOM that small are going to get you some red pen from me for sure...

Gonna go ahead and secure my nerd flag with heavy cable on this one...

 

[Expat]

 

[indyartisan]

 

[KLB]

hm

 

[mbkintner]

That section view actually does appear to be wrong (I don't think it's projected accurately) and item balloons that are vertically out of order with a BOM that small are going to get you some red pen from me for sure...

Gonna go ahead and secure my nerd flag with heavy cable on this one...

I'll consult with my design engineer.

 

[bwframe]

Pretty cool, adding pics right from the phone...

 

[maxwelhse]

I'll consult with my design engineer.

A triple decker configuration would be nice while he's at it... Might meed to install a banana layer at some point.

 

[bwframe]

So objectively, for best viewing in a thread, would we rather see the smaller pic as an attachment or the whole pic taking up more or all the space on the page?

 

[maxwelhse]

So objectively, for best viewing in a thread, would we rather see the smaller pic as an attachment or the whole pic taking up more or all the space on the page?

I prefer whole image (of hopefully not insane original size). The thumbnails it used to generate if people used INGO to host were uselessly small to me.

 

[mbkintner]

I prefer whole image (of hopefully not insane original size). The thumbnails it used to generate if people used INGO to host were uselessly small to me.

+1

 

[bwframe]

I prefer whole image (of hopefully not insane original size). The thumbnails it used to generate if people used INGO to host were uselessly small to me.

I like the bigger pics myself, although sometimes the smaller attachment size is more appropriate for the thread content. Clicking on the attachment goes to a whole page image. Or it least it did for my pic posting today here.

I'm hoping the site will size the big images appropriately, like the old format did?

 

[maxwelhse]

I like the bigger pics myself, although sometimes the smaller attachment size is more appropriate for the thread content. Clicking on the attachment goes to a whole page image.

I'm hoping the site will size the image appropriately, like the old format did?

Ehhh... It looks like we're running pretty WYSIWYG right now. A couple seem to have posted pretty giant up thread.

I'd be OK with a 500x500-ish resizing. For those that don't speak nerd, that would be about 1/2 of a typical desktop display (or phone in landscape mode) in height and about 1/4 of the width. This post as I'm reading and writing it right now occupies about 1/3 of my height.

 

[bwframe]

I'm hoping one of the IT wizards here will come along and tell us there is no security issue to posting pics to the site directly from your phone?

Location tags, other behind the scene info to be snatched up by nerdowells?

 

[maxwelhse]

I'm hoping one of the IT wizards here will come along and tell us there is no security issue to posting pics to the site directly from your phone?

Location tags, other behind the scene info to be snatched up by nerdowells?

I'd strip that stuff myself, regardless.

 

[bwframe]

Ehhh... It looks like we're running pretty WYSIWYG right now. A couple seem to have posted pretty giant up thread.

I'd be OK with a 500x500-ish resizing. For those that don't speak nerd, that would be about 1/2 of a typical desktop display (or phone in landscape mode) in height and about 1/4 of the width. This post as I'm reading and writing it right now occupies about 1/3 of my height.

I post a lot of pics. I'd rather not resize or fool with them at all.

Making it simpler to post pics is a really good thing. There are still longtime members that did not warm to posting pics on the old format. They were not dummies either, just ran into issues that were difficult or impossible to overcome.