The fail is strong with this one.

[Frank_N_Stein]

I've always wondered why people obscure faces or names in photos or screen captures. Care to enlighten me since you say it was very appropriate? Thanks.

I did it because I didn't have permission to post the picture.

 

[DanVoils]

I did it because I didn't have permission to post the picture.

How did you acquire the picture? Was it on a public forum or social media?

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

How did you acquire the picture? Was it on a public forum or social media?

Facebook

 

[Bennettjh]

That's dumb. A good way to get your brains blown out on camera.

Is that a trend now for men to wear purple vests and ties?

 

[sheepdog697]

This is why some animals eat their young.

 

[DanVoils]

Facebook

There's my point. People post BS on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and Twitter then others cover up their doofus antics. What's wrong with calling them out? SMDH at the snowflake attitudes.

 

[Frank_N_Stein]

There's my point. People post BS on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and Twitter then others cover up their doofus antics. What's wrong with calling them out? SMDH at the snowflake attitudes.

I'm not the smartest guy, but are you calling me a snowflake because I covered their faces or them snowflakes because of their doofus antics?

 

[JettaKnight]

Yeah, I don't get it - who's thinking they are special needs to be treated by everyone else with exceptions? (i.e. a "snowflake")


This is pure, "Hey y'all, watch this!"


- Jetta, defender of the meaning of "snowflake"

 

[rhino]

The idea behind this photo could have been brought to slightly humorous fruition and still not been completely stupid. A bigger pistol or a revolver in a nice barbecue rig on the belt with the father in law holding his jacket back with his hands on his hips would have conveyed the same message, but no one would be at risk. As it is, it's stupid, dangerous, and not funny.