indiucky
Grandmaster
I know them personally and not a snowflake among them.
I don't know...You've never seen BBI not get a milk shake when someone else did....
I know them personally and not a snowflake among them.
ooooh, this ARK guy's gonna be a popular new addition ain't he?
Already remedied!
The Ark sank????
I'm gonna' drop off some semi-informed bits of info gleaned this morning. Three officers fired shots. Total of seven shots fired. All bullets accounted for. None hit the house. Home owner refusing to talk to the police but willing to talk to the media! Hmmmmmmm.
Holes in the siding? I don't know and neither do you but see above.
Onto a very special list!
I'm gonna' drop off some semi-informed bits of info gleaned this morning. Three officers fired shots. Total of seven shots fired. All bullets accounted for. None hit the house. Home owner refusing to talk to the police but willing to talk to the media! Hmmmmmmm.
Holes in the siding? I don't know and neither do you but see above.
Bwahahahahahahaha! The “police bullet hole” in their siding as pictured in theWTHR article is clearly visible in a Google Street View image that was captured long before yesterday. LMAO. Just tryna get paid!!!
View attachment 62164
View attachment 62165
But...maybe after penetrating the perp? the city council should spring for some specialty ammo from Hollywood that never misses; never over penetrates; doesn't require reloading; and if it does hit a good guy, merely requires reciting the incantation "dang pilgrim, that hurt--a little" before wiping off the red stuff.I know we are only packin puny poodle-shootin 9mm these days, but rounds into a house probably wouldn’t have stopped after hitting the siding.
I know we are only packin puny poodle-shootin 9mm these days, but rounds into a house probably wouldn’t have stopped after hitting the siding.
I don't know...You've never seen BBI not get a milk shake when someone else did....
... and if it does hit a good guy, merely requires reciting the incantation "dang pilgrim, that hurt--a little" before wiping off the red stuff.
I actually have seen it occur one time. It was one of those odd freaky things bullets sometimes do. It was a murder in a back yard and one bullet hit the siding at just the right angle that it penetrated aluminum siding, hit the plywood behind it, and then just spun in place. I didn't think it was a bullet when I first saw it, it just looked so...not right. I wasn't convinced it was a bullet until crime lab pulled it out.
That was FMJ round nose.
I just was reading where a 6 year old was killed in a similar situation in Texas, tough spot to be in........Texas Cops Shoot and Kill 6-Year-Old While Shooting and Killing Woman They Were Chasing - Hit & Run : Reason.com
Well then I'm sure Mr. Ark will be along shortly with his heartfelt apologies to all of the IMPD officers he insulted with his asinine posts? I mean, it’s only the manly thing to do! Rather it’s what a non-Snowflake would do.Bwahahahahahahaha! The “police bullet hole” in their siding as pictured in theWTHR article is clearly visible in a Google Street View image that was captured long before yesterday. LMAO. Just tryna get paid!!!
View attachment 62164
View attachment 62165
I know we are only packin puny poodle-shootin 9mm these days, but rounds into a house probably wouldn’t have stopped after hitting the siding.
Bwahahahahahahaha! The “police bullet hole” in their siding as pictured in theWTHR article is clearly visible in a Google Street View image that was captured long before yesterday. LMAO. Just tryna get paid!!!
View attachment 62164
View attachment 62165
I'll bet they hate it when they realize they got scammed by a publicity seeker.
No, they won't. They weren't "scammed", they were willing participants. The goal is not to publish the truth, if it were there would be some level of due diligence before publishing. The goal is to make money. Truth is often boring, doesn't get views, doesn't start conversations. This, however, does.
I had an in custody death and the media published an account by a guy who said he watched officers beat the man to death with batons. When a homicide detective talked to him, he admitted he was too far away to see, his view was obstructed by both buildings and traffic, and said "well...they could have". Nobody used a baton, and the guy didn't die from trauma, but from a combination of excited delirium, positional asphyxiation, and the cocktail of intoxicants he'd consumed prior to coming to police attention.
They also published an incident where we "threw someone down the stairs" despite video showing us carrying him down. We "choked him" (apparently as we threw him down the stairs) despite the video clearly showing my hand on his chest to keep him still. I'm not sure how you throw someone and simultaneously choke them, but logic and basic sense isn't as much fun as cooking up another "brutality" story.
They'll eat the next one up with a spoon as well because they are part of the scam, not the victim.