PLEASE elaborate. I'm aware of the risk pertaining to state sanctioned marriage and children, but this one has me a bit un-nerved. Feel free to PM me if you don't want to threadjack.
It should. Check out Parker vs Hurley from the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. This has been the prevailing decision regarding public, private and home education law and the Supreme Court has always went to it. In brief, it is a great decision on the one hand and a hard to live with one on the other. Basically, the court upheld parental rights to raise their children and are not, and I quote, "required to abandon that responsibility to the state." They went on to say that parents have the right to send their children for private education (both private institutions and home education) as well as the right to send them to public schools. But it's that phrasing "abandon" that's problematic. In their view, if you send your child to public school you have abandoned your responsibility to the state for their educational training. Thus, whatever the state desires (or possibly even requires) of the student is just tough cookies if you don't like it.