downrange72
Grandmaster
So mean and unprovoked! #cyberbully
Pet the dog for me. She deserves better than you.
She likes Jeff and Mom almost as much as me
So mean and unprovoked! #cyberbully
Pet the dog for me. She deserves better than you.
You spend money for that haircut you got?
Viruses don’t care that you need to eat or need to go to the grocery store.
Obviously, but you obviously are missing the point. We sometimes take risks because we have to, but it's foolish to take risks for things that we don't need.
It's really a simple concept; too bad that some people can't grasp it.
my point is that you’ve been exposed to it already, and you will continue to be exposed to it unless you truly can stay in your house 100% of the time. If your not healthy enough to attend a match stay home, I’m not going to visit any elderly or sick family, friends etc.
How do you KNOW that someone has been exposed? And you KNOW that you don't have it, and you KNOW that you won't pick it up from someone and/or pass it on? No, you don't KNOW any of those things. And as long as one doesn't KNOW, then doing as much to avoid contact is the proper course of action. A shooting match, especially indoors, is an unnecessary risk right now. Attending one is self-indulgent and selfish.
Agree to disagree then, you stay home and where A mask thinking Covid is a death sentence. I’ll be self indulgent and selfish in this hypothetical situation.
The families of 116 in Indiana and 7100 nation wide(so far) would argue that Covid is a death sentence.
Since hypothetically it is about you.
You set up the match.
You RO everyone.
You run the tablet after the shooter is done.
You sign for financial liability so if someone comes to the match and gets sick and dies their family sues you and not the club.
You be the one responsible when someone call the police for a gathering of 10 or more taking place and they come to arrest someone(you).
You be the one that the club members then hate for the repercussions the club suffers from some one who was indulgent and selfish.
Hypothetically of course.
Taking the legal restriction of 10 or less out of the conversation, the title is “who would go?”
116 flu deaths last year and we didn’t disrupt the shooting season even a little. I’d be fine to run a match if legal. Again the conversation is moot because a match would be illegal but if it weren’t I would shoot.
116 flu deaths in a whole year vs 116 in what the last 2 months? Double digit deaths in the last few days and getting worse. They are not the same thing.
Yes the title is "who would go" but when someone says that they won't you seem to want to argue and insinuate that they are somehow lesser(scared) for not wanting to expose them or their family's to the virus.
I'l be glad when this passes(hopefully soon) so we can all get back to shooting matches and some sense of normalcy.
not my intention to make anyone feel lesser For making they’re decision and I meant it quite literally if you’re concerned stay home. The inverse has also happened to me for voicing my decision as others have accused me of “killing their friend” up thread
not my intention to make anyone feel lesser For making they’re decision and I meant it quite literally if you’re concerned stay home. The inverse has also happened to me for voicing my decision as others have accused me of “killing their friend” up thread
The experts know they are not saving lives in the absolute sense with these measures. They're just spreading it out so as to not overwhelm the system.