The election shenanigans thread

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,747
    113
    Gtown-ish
    C'mon jamil. You are just not trying hard enough to maintain your usual suspect membership. There has got to be something.
    Okay. I’ll fess up. I only accept this source because it confirms what I’ve been saying the whole time. Mail in voting. Makes it very hard to catch people cheating.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,097
    113
    North Central
    Yep, unpossible the IC (intelligence community) would be involved in elections and they certainly would never use their technical capabilities to affect the votes of an election…


     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana
    Yep, unpossible the IC (intelligence community) would be involved in elections and they certainly would never use their technical capabilities to affect the votes of an election…


    Saw this as well.

    In truth, the US IC asked the “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance to surveil Trump’s associates and share the intelligence they acquired with US agencies, say sources close to a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HSPCI) investigation. The Five Eyes nations are the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

    After Public and Racket had been told that President Barack Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan, had identified 26 Trump associates for the Five Eyes to target, a source confirmed that the IC had “identified [them] as people to ‘bump,’ or make contact with or manipulate. They were targets of our own IC and law enforcement — targets for collection and misinformation.”

    Unknown details about the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign and raw intelligence related to the IC’s surveillance of the Trump campaign are in a 10-inch binder that Trump ordered to be declassified at the very end of his term, sources told Public and Racket.

    If the top-secret documents exist proving these charges, they are potentially proof that multiple US intelligence officials broke laws against spying and election interference.

    “They were making contacts and bumping Trump people going back to March 2016,” a source close to the investigation said. “They were sending people around the UK, Australia, Italy — the Mossad in Italy. The MI6 was working at an intelligence school they had set up.”

    The IC, a source said, considered the 26 Trump campaign people identified to “bump” or “reverse target,” or manipulate through confidential human sources (CHSs), to be easy marks because of their relative inexperience.

    Doing so was illegal, both because US law prohibits such intelligence gathering unless authorized by a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant and because the weaponization of the IC for political purposes constitutes election interference.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,747
    113
    Gtown-ish
    View attachment 332995

    ‘What difference, at this point, [will] it make?'

    Look at how many people even on INGO say Trump should not pursue retribution if he is re-elected and we need to 'heal' the country - forgetting that you don't suture the wound until all the infection has been removed

    Normal isn't
    coming back
    Pursue legal remedies to bring those people to justice. That’s simply using government’s law enforcement powers justly, for legal purposes. Anything beyond that is no better than the people who weaponized government against political enemies if Trump does the same. And people who cheer for that are hypocrites because it’s not the weaponization you’re against. You’re just against the people you hate doing it against the people you like.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    104,512
    149
    Southside Indy
    Pursue legal remedies to bring those people to justice. That’s simply using government’s law enforcement powers justly, for legal purposes. Anything beyond that is no better than the people who weaponized government against political enemies if Trump does the same. And people who cheer for that are hypocrites because it’s not the weaponization you’re against. You’re just against the people you hate doing it against the people you like.
    1708202962608.png
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,097
    113
    North Central
    Pursue legal remedies to bring those people to justice. That’s simply using government’s law enforcement powers justly, for legal purposes. Anything beyond that is no better than the people who weaponized government against political enemies if Trump does the same. And people who cheer for that are hypocrites because it’s not the weaponization you’re against. You’re just against the people you hate doing it against the people you like.
    You clearly don’t get it. Still want to play by Queensbury rules.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana
    View attachment 332995

    ‘What difference, at this point, [will] it make?'

    Look at how many people even on INGO say Trump should not pursue retribution if he is re-elected and we need to 'heal' the country - forgetting that you don't suture the wound until all the infection has been removed

    Normal isn't
    coming back
    Ripples

     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,057
    113
    Mitchell
    All this election related software and mail in ballots seem a lot more complicated and buggy than one would think necessary. Some bugs are features, I suppose.

     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,517
    149
    Indiana
    All this election related software and mail in ballots seem a lot more complicated and buggy than one would think necessary. Some bugs are features, I suppose.

    No the problem is the computer showed who voted, only quite a few who checked had not actually voted even though it said they did. When word spread for people who did not vote to check their record, and many did finding out they had voted in the primary when they had not. Alarms started going off. So what were the riggers going to do? Claimed a county level computer error was the cause and shut off public access to the system.

    Why? Because thousands who did not vote DID.



    To add to the cover up...if you figured out you were one who had not voted who did,and reported it you suddenly became unregistered to vote at all and your records disappeared.

    "Las Vegas resident and registered Republican Daphne Lee told the outlet that her family checked the secretary of state's website on Sunday to look up their voter history after hearing about the issue. The site showed that she and her family had voted in the primary despite none of them having done so. She attempted to opt out of future mail-in ballots and was unable to do so - with a message saying she was not currently registered to vote, and that her voting history no longer existed."
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom