Down the road with the 350JR
Two seasons under the belt of this round. Sold one rifle out of necessity due to finance/health issues but one still here in service.
9 deer down with it now. 180 grain Hot Core and 220 grain Hot Core 2750 and 2500 fps respectively out of our 20 inch barrels and white there is a small bit of difference in recoil the end results are the same. No tracking required.
With the higher BC of the 338 bullets over the 358 bore bullets, half thinking of building a 338JR. A tad more capacity and able to load even the really long Accubond bullets in the 225 grain range (for something bigger than deer) it would sneak by the 338 Federal and 358 Winchester in point of aim ranges and deliver considerable more energy down range.
Yep, some bigger rounds out there but will still stand by few are more efficient, especially considering the lower recoil of this size capacity rounds, factory or not.
Nope, wouldn't be able to use a 338JR in Indiana (yet) but danged if wildcatting didn't get in my blood. If making such for the "market" I'd run SAUM brass but an old time belted round lover (having 400 350 RM brass now)......I think Ill stick with that.
All the Hoosier wildcats are more than adequate for whitetail at our ranges. Not a one would get a negative comment out of me. Just a word of congrats to those fellow Hoosier's that put their noggin in gear and went to work. All fun and games and I for one am half glad the DNR set the regs the way they did.
While some doors were closed to us, we opened some new ones, creating what will be remembered in time for decades to come.
All said and done, the super short IN rounds have come to make me realize how great this length is with the ability to still seat very long, high BC bullets (if wanted) on top of powder charges at least similar to some factory rounds if not a bit more..........not going into the "powder area" of the cartridge.
I ran some numbers on a 375 bore using cut back 338 Norma mag brass (the new one from 2010 or so) that is same base size as the Lapua round. Doable, with a working capacity around 67 grains under the neck but not doable "cheap" at all. Best option for this ol bird would be a rebarrel Ruger No 1 if going there.
Now if I lived in an area where hunting Kodiaks and Yukon moose........I might go there. As is all I can think about is the cost and R E C O I L !!
50 grains (ish) of >>>>>usable<<<< capacity seems about "perfect" for an all round cartridge, IMHO both recoil and cost wise and for ranges out to 300 plus yards in some calibers, and certain bullets.
200 yards will mostly do it all for 99.9 percent of us here.......even out of state something over 300 wouldn't be my preference, but if you run the 338 Nosler 225 grain accubond with a BC of .550 through your fav trajectory calculator..........take special notice of the velocity and energy retained at 400 yards.
Needed? no
Fun? oh heck yeah
Who said we had to build things we "need" anyway?
God Bless
Two seasons under the belt of this round. Sold one rifle out of necessity due to finance/health issues but one still here in service.
9 deer down with it now. 180 grain Hot Core and 220 grain Hot Core 2750 and 2500 fps respectively out of our 20 inch barrels and white there is a small bit of difference in recoil the end results are the same. No tracking required.
With the higher BC of the 338 bullets over the 358 bore bullets, half thinking of building a 338JR. A tad more capacity and able to load even the really long Accubond bullets in the 225 grain range (for something bigger than deer) it would sneak by the 338 Federal and 358 Winchester in point of aim ranges and deliver considerable more energy down range.
Yep, some bigger rounds out there but will still stand by few are more efficient, especially considering the lower recoil of this size capacity rounds, factory or not.
Nope, wouldn't be able to use a 338JR in Indiana (yet) but danged if wildcatting didn't get in my blood. If making such for the "market" I'd run SAUM brass but an old time belted round lover (having 400 350 RM brass now)......I think Ill stick with that.
All the Hoosier wildcats are more than adequate for whitetail at our ranges. Not a one would get a negative comment out of me. Just a word of congrats to those fellow Hoosier's that put their noggin in gear and went to work. All fun and games and I for one am half glad the DNR set the regs the way they did.
While some doors were closed to us, we opened some new ones, creating what will be remembered in time for decades to come.
All said and done, the super short IN rounds have come to make me realize how great this length is with the ability to still seat very long, high BC bullets (if wanted) on top of powder charges at least similar to some factory rounds if not a bit more..........not going into the "powder area" of the cartridge.
I ran some numbers on a 375 bore using cut back 338 Norma mag brass (the new one from 2010 or so) that is same base size as the Lapua round. Doable, with a working capacity around 67 grains under the neck but not doable "cheap" at all. Best option for this ol bird would be a rebarrel Ruger No 1 if going there.
Now if I lived in an area where hunting Kodiaks and Yukon moose........I might go there. As is all I can think about is the cost and R E C O I L !!
50 grains (ish) of >>>>>usable<<<< capacity seems about "perfect" for an all round cartridge, IMHO both recoil and cost wise and for ranges out to 300 plus yards in some calibers, and certain bullets.
200 yards will mostly do it all for 99.9 percent of us here.......even out of state something over 300 wouldn't be my preference, but if you run the 338 Nosler 225 grain accubond with a BC of .550 through your fav trajectory calculator..........take special notice of the velocity and energy retained at 400 yards.
Needed? no
Fun? oh heck yeah
Who said we had to build things we "need" anyway?
God Bless
Last edited: