Armed Communists/Antifa March in Georgia

[jamil]

I find it baffling how easily some would question another's ability to express their rights. As if some are more entitled to them than others. Oh wait, this is the United States. We have a long history of that. Nevermind, carry on.

Wow. Who said they don’t have a right to OC? We’re only saying their purpose in OC’ing is not pro 2a advocacy. They openly talk on social media about the civil war they want to have with the “fash”; ironically as they engage in some fascist behaviors themselves.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I assume you're fine with yelling "Fire" in a theater too. Because that's what's happening. Let me ask you something. If a bunch of people showed up in front of your house, guns drawn, or at the low ready, and were calling for you to come out, would you feel threatened, or would you come out and smile and invite them in? Because technically, they're not breaking any laws, right? That's what Antifa has started doing (figuratively speaking).

Of course I would. If you're saying that people should be wary, sure, I'll go along with that. However, I'm not going to go off the deep in and ask "why are they carrying weapons," when that right is protected. I'd be more worried about their imminent actions, not simply the optics of a group I disagree with carrying a weapon. In fact, weapons wouldn't even need to be present for there to be concerned on my part.

 

[jamil]

I guess we found the line where freedom loving Americans have drawn to limit the freedom of other Americans.

You keep inferring facts not in evidence.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Wow. Who said they don’t have a right to OC? We’re only saying their purpose in OC’ing is not pro 2a advocacy. They openly talk on social media about the civil war they want to have with the “fash”; ironically as they engage in some fascist behaviors themselves.

Well duh, they were there to protect other protesters. The fact that they can OC, despite their reasons, is 2A Advocacy.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Of course I would. If you're saying that people should be wary, sure, I'll go along with that. However, I'm not going to go off the deep in and ask "why are they carrying weapons," when that right is protected. I'd be more worried about their imminent actions, not simply the optics of a group I disagree with carrying a weapon. In fact, weapons wouldn't even need to be present for there to be concerned on my part.

These are not people interested in preserving your rights Kut. These are people interested in overthrowing the government as we know it. They have gone beyond peaceful protest (which I support) to intimidation and threatening behavior, and even planting bombs outside police stations in Oregon. That is not "protected speech". I find it surprising that you are defending them.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Well duh, they were there to protect other protesters. The fact that they can OC, despite their reasons, is 2A Advocacy.

So armed people outside your house making threatening comments is just okie dokie with you? Um, okay... I mean, they're just exercising their 2A rights, right? Wow...

 

[Bennettjh]

I'm not too concerned with the firearms, unless they mean harm to someone (as with anybody). I DO have a problem with them pushing Communism in America. Why don't they move to Vietnam and live happily ever after?

 

[Kutnupe14]

These are not people interested in preserving your rights Kut. These are people interested in overthrowing the government as we know it. They have gone beyond peaceful protest (which I support) to intimidation and threatening behavior, and even planting bombs outside police stations in Oregon. That is not "protected speech". I find it surprising that you are defending them.

Actually, I'm not so sure this is accurate. Some Antifa are like that, so aren't. Some are called "Antifa," who aren't even part of that group. From my understanding, the group that marched, was a hodgepodge of different groups, all opposing the Klan. Is there anything credible that indicated that the persons carrying guns were members of Antifa? I ask this because during the Unite the Right Rally, the OathKeepers were present, but they supposedly didn't identify with the racist marchers.

 

[Kutnupe14]

So armed people outside your house making threatening comments is just okie dokie with you? Um, okay... I mean, they're just exercising their 2A rights, right? Wow...

If they are focusing their attention on me and my home, yes. If they're walking by my home, and don't seem to pay me any mind, I'm less concerned.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I'm not too concerned with the firearms, unless they mean harm to someone (as with anybody). I DO have a problem with them pushing Communism in America. Why don't they move to Vietnam and live happily ever after?

From an ideological standpoint sure, but not in a "it should be against the law," way, right?

 

[Route 45]

Nah, just using deductive reasoning.

 

[jamil]

Well duh, they were there to protect other protesters. The fact that they can OC, despite their reasons, is 2A Advocacy.

So is itching for their civil war.

 

[Kutnupe14]

So is itching for their civil war.

Wait, are you talking about certain persons in the INGO membership or the armed protesters?

 

[jamil]

Wait, are you talking about certain persons in the INGO membership or the armed protesters?

You know my answer to that. There aren’t many reasons to ask that, now is there.

 

[Kutnupe14]

You know my answer to that. There aren’t many reasons to ask that, now is there.

Well it was ambiguous, and we know there are those type of persons here too.

 

[Dead Duck]

Well it was ambiguous, and we know there are those type of persons here too.

Hey now!

What do you mean by... "Those Type"?

 

[Restroyer]

Well it was ambiguous, and we know there are those type of persons here too.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Guys...

Gettin' a little warm in here. About bed time for me anyhow. Kut, one of these days, we gotta have that burrito we talked about awhile back. I know neither of us are the asses we portray ourselves as here sometimes.

 

[OakRiver]

Before we get too far down the civil war discussion path; https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...n/12952-posting-about-inciting-civil-war.html

"Don't bring up the topic. Don't kid about it. Don't joke about it. Don't be sarcastic about it. YOU WILL BE BANNED.
PURPLE WILL NOT SAVE YOU.
THE FBI DOES NOT SEE PURPLE."



"If you think you can dress it up by disguising it with synonyms and vague language, you're going to be in for a rude awakening when you find yourself gone from INGO and a warrant at your door.

Don't hint.
Don't suggest.
Don't joke.
DON'T DISCUSS IT ON INGO.


IT IS NOT WELCOME HERE. AT ALL. PERIOD. TAKE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE."

 

[Kutnupe14]

Guys...

Gettin' a little warm in here. About bed time for me anyhow. Kut, one of these days, we gotta have that burrito we talked about awhile back. I know neither of us are the asses we portray ourselves as here sometimes.

Lol, true