As If We Need ANOTHER Reason To Vote For Trump...

[Dr.Midnight]

Ah, you were engaging with no intent of honest discourse. Gotcha.
And you say “your ancestors,” you mean “Americans,” in general? Well we both have that in common then.

I didn't think honesty was a huge issue for someone accusing Melina of being a gold digger and Trump of being a white supremacist because some KKK members voted for him.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I didn't think honesty was a huge issue for someone accusing Melina of being a gold digger and Trump of being a white supremacist because some KKK members voted for him.

Whether you like it or not, when a young hot, (and foreign woman) marries and old rich American man, she's gonna be called a gold digger. It's been that way forever. Anybody besides Dr. Midnight believe otherwise? And, I've never called a Trump a white supremacist. But I do have to give you credit for trying to change the subject from Harry and Meghan.

 

[Dr.Midnight]

Whether you like it or not, when a young hot, (and foreign woman) marries and old rich American man, she's gonna be called a gold digger. It's been that way forever. Anybody besides Dr. Midnight believe otherwise? And, I've never called a Trump a white supremacist. But I do have to give you credit for trying to change the subject from Harry and Meghan.

So it's ok to make assumptions based on what we think with no evidence? Cool. What type of refreshments do they serve at ANTIFA meetings? I've always wanted to know that.

 

[CampingJosh]

So it's ok to make assumptions based on what we think with no evidence?

I believe the great American philosopher K. West published an essay on the topic.

[video=youtube_share;6vwNcNOTVzY]http://youtu.be/6vwNcNOTVzY[/video]

But seriously, a poor woman married a wealthy man. That's the definition.

And how did we transition to this topic?

 

[Kutnupe14]

So it's ok to make assumptions based on what we think with no evidence? Cool. What type of refreshments do they serve at ANTIFA meetings? I've always wanted to know that.

No idea, I wouldn't know. Anyways, yeah sure, I have no problem calling Melania a gold digger. I'd wager most people probably think that. Would you rather I call her a pornographic model?

Though, on the gold digger note, Melania met Trump while he was supposed to see another woman, and still married to Marla Maples (separated though). During that first encounter Trump gave her his number, and SHE later called, despite the fact that she said she was "turned off," by trump.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I believe the great American philosopher K. West published an essay on the topic.

[video=youtube_share;6vwNcNOTVzY]http://youtu.be/6vwNcNOTVzY[/video]

But seriously, a poor woman married a wealthy man. That's the definition.

And how did we transition to this topic?

I asked why Meghan Markle was getting so much hate, because, after all she was doing what Americans do best.... screw the monarchy (literally and figuratively, I guess). And Dr. Midnight wanted to transition into Melania and gold diggers. I think he wanted a segway in to talking about me, because that where we ended up.

 

[Clay Pigeon]

I call her The Best looking First Lady we have ever had....

Haters are gonna Hate.....

 

[bwframe]

Any excuse to replay the MAGA hat wearing Kanye vid is good by me.

[video=youtube;6vwNcNOTVzY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=88&v=6vwNcNOTVzY&feature=emb_l ogo[/video]

I don't give a crap about the crown. I know witches when I see them though...
Meghan Markle is a high maintenance gold digger, the same as a lot of us were formerly married to.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Any excuse to replay the MAGA hat wearing Kanye vid is good by me.

[video=youtube;6vwNcNOTVzY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=88&v=6vwNcNOTVzY&feature=emb_l ogo[/video]

I don't give a crap about the crown. I know witches when I see them though...
Meghan Markle is a high maintenance gold digger, the same as a lot of us were formerly married to.

So you would also agree that Melania is a gold digger too?

 

[printcraft]

80,000 signatures on a petition to force Harry and Megan to pay for their own security living in Canada, expected to cost $10 million a year and they do not want Cannadian public money going for it.

How in the hell would they even consider having a foreign gov. pay for their security?
Talk about fantasy land. If the British want to foot the bill for their “royals” tally ho lads.
Canada shouldn’t pay one single acorn or whatever their currency is.

 

[Kutnupe14]

How in the hell would they even consider having a foreign gov. pay for their security?
Talk about fantasy land. If the British want to foot the bill for their “royals” tally ho lads.
Canada shouldn’t pay one single acorn or whatever their currency is.

I'm glad you said this, because it explains why you don't know. Take a look a Canadian dollar, and guess who you'll see? Constitutionally, Queen Elizabeth is Canada's sovereign. It's unclear, since this new "status" has been bestowed on Harry and Meghan, how they fit in, but I can see why it was considered.

 

[printcraft]

I'm glad you said this, because it explains why you don't know. Take a look a Canadian dollar, and guess who you'll see? Constitutionally, Queen Elizabeth is Canada's sovereign. It's unclear, since this new "status" has been bestowed on Harry and Meghan, how they fit in, but I can see why it was considered.

What do the French Canadians think about that?
We used to be a British colony too... I have a solution...

 

[Clay Pigeon]

 

[Kutnupe14]

What do the French Canadians think about that?
We used to be a British colony too... I have a solution...

Geez, PC are you serious? Yes, we used to be a British colony. We broke from the Crown via revolution. Nations like Canada, or those in the Commonwealth, were allowed the leave the empire, and yet still hold a special status within it.

 

[nonobaddog]

How in the hell would they even consider having a foreign gov. pay for their security?
Talk about fantasy land. If the British want to foot the bill for their “royals” tally ho lads.
Canada shouldn’t pay one single acorn or whatever their currency is.

Maple leaves and loonies.

 

[printcraft]

Geez, PC are you serious? Yes, we used to be a British colony. We broke from the Crown via revolution. Nations like Canada, or those in the Commonwealth, were allowed the leave the empire, and yet still hold a special status within it.

Serious as a heart attack.

If special status means getting to pay for the lifestyle of "royals" then they can keep it.

"You are "special" citizens of the crown, give me your money so you may bask in my glory pleb." **** that noise.

 

[jamil]

I believe the great American philosopher K. West published an essay on the topic.


But seriously, a poor woman married a wealthy man. That's the definition.

And how did we transition to this topic?

I thought Melania was a well paid model. So not poor. But certainly not anywhere in the same league as Trump. So I’d change the definition to be something like marrying up in wealth, marrying down in looks/age. And I think it makes her a likely gold digger. She married of her league in wealth. He married out of his league in looks/age.

I don’t get why that’s so hard for people to admit. It happens all the time with attractive women. They often marry for wealth, because they can. Wealthy men marry for looks, because they can. Kut likes to call her a whore probably in retaliation because people make fun of Michelle’s bulge. But fulfillment of human nature doesn’t make her a whore.

 

[jamil]

I call her The Best looking First Lady we have ever had....

Haters are gonna Hate.....

I don’t hate her. She seems to be a nice person. She gets way too much **** from haters. But. She is a gold digger.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

 

[Ingomike]

I thought Melania was a well paid model. So not poor. But certainly not anywhere in the same league as Trump. So I’d change the definition to be something like marrying up in wealth, marrying down in looks/age. And I think it makes her a likely gold digger. She married of her league in wealth. He married out of his league in looks/age.

I don’t get why that’s so hard for people to admit. It happens all the time with attractive women. They often marry for wealth, because they can. Wealthy men marry for looks, because they can. Kut likes to call her a whore probably in retaliation because people make fun of Michelle’s bulge. But fulfillment of human nature doesn’t make her a whore.

While it goes against the PC snowflake world we live in men and women are attracted to different things, men to women of beauty, women to men of means and power. That does not make women whores for sure.

I am am not sure what an unexpected bulge indicates...

 

[nonobaddog]

She is gorgeous - and in a different time there would be pictures of her in every paper and news show and all over. But she is thankful for the lack of press coverage - which shows intelligence.