It's not just one thing.In your opinion what doesn't fit about Glocks for some people. I see this a lot on here. Is it people with smaller hands? As I mentioned in another post Sigs feel better in my hand. But after shooting a Glock for a while it doesn't bother me at all.
It's not just one thing.
For many it's the finger grooves being in the wrong spot. Others it's too fat (even the 19's). And others, as mentioned above, find the angle puts recoil into joints in an odd way. And lastly it's the angle as the pistol is raised to the eye - often it's combined with the stance the shooter uses; If they lock out the arms, it stresses the wrist(s). Glocks seem to be designed more for a Weaver-like stance - And I have no idea if that was intentional, it's just an observation.
[Obviously, problems 1 &2 can be cured by Robar, or the like.]
It's not just one thing.
For many it's the finger grooves being in the wrong spot. Others it's too fat (even the 19's). And others, as mentioned above, find the angle puts recoil into joints in an odd way. And lastly it's the angle as the pistol is raised to the eye - often it's combined with the stance the shooter uses; If they lock out the arms, it stresses the wrist(s). Glocks seem to be designed more for a Weaver-like stance - And I have no idea if that was intentional, it's just an observation.
If you want controversy, "ALL DEFENSE PISTOLS SHOULD BE 9MM GLOCKS!"
There ya go.
all Glocks are created equal, just that the .40 is a little better