Omnibus budget said to be full of gun regulations heads to Trump's desk

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I think President Trump will veto this crappy bill

I saw something like this on Ben Shapiro's site a while ago. It's probably him straddling both sides of the fence because the day before he was for it. I hope he does veto it.

 

[Expat]

Local news at noon said WH is saying possible veto.

 

[Dentoro]

Is will never ever vote demoncrap again, period, the end. I pulled third party ticket on every lever I could last two elections excluding presidental elections. When is the last time they actually made a significant contribution to liberty, to the republic or to the people? 50 years ago? The good thing is, with every stupid law they pass and legislation signed they make themselves more irreverent.

 

[lonehoosier]

I think President Trump will veto this crappy bill

Local news at noon said WH is saying possible veto.

Trump signs $1.3 trillion spending bill, despite earlier threat to veto Trump signs $1.3 trillion spending bill, despite earlier threat to veto | Fox News

 

[Expat]

Trump signs $1.3 trillion spending bill, despite earlier threat to veto Trump signs $1.3 trillion spending bill, despite earlier threat to veto | Fox News

YEah, he is on right now justifying the bill.... it is so filled with great things.

 

[T.Lex]

I thought Paul Ryan even suggested he should veto, because so many people who voted for it (the majority of whom are Rs) hadn't read it.

I think the only gun-related thing is the CDC study funding. Which results will not be a shock to anyone, methinks.

 

[d.kaufman]

Nothing like adding another trillion to the deficit!!!

 

[seedubs1]

Lol.....good job voting these clowns into office INGO Republicans.

We were better off with Obama and a divided 3 branches that did nothing. We'd be better off with Hilldawg in the White House. At least then, nothing would get done and it'd be a gridlocked .gov.

 

[T.Lex]

Lol.....good job voting these clowns into office INGO Republicans.

We were better off with Obama and a divided 3 branches that did nothing. We'd be better off with Hilldawg in the White House. At least then, nothing would get done and it'd be a gridlocked .gov.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Lol.....good job voting these clowns into office INGO Republicans.

We were better off with Obama and a divided 3 branches that did nothing. We'd be better off with Hilldawg in the White House. At least then, nothing would get done and it'd be a gridlocked .gov.

^^^^He gets it. Nobody glows.

 

[actaeon277]

^^^^He gets it. Nobody glows.

I glow.
But I may have absorbed too many "zoomies" standing too close to a nuke.

 

[T.Lex]

^^^^He gets it. Nobody glows.

I'm sorry.

Obama was effective enough to pass Obamacare, and defend it in SCOTUS, which decided it wasn't a tax. Where was gridlock when we REALLY needed it.

Now, we basically have a third [strike]rate[/strike] party POTUS and Republican Congress.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I'm sorry.

Obama was effective enough to pass Obamacare, and defend it in SCOTUS, which decided it wasn't a tax. Where was gridlock when we REALLY needed it.

Now, we basically have a third [strike]rate[/strike] party POTUS and Republican Congress.

Obama had a Democrat congress when the ACA passed, two years after he was elected there was a split, and two years after that it was GOP controlled.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Lol.....good job voting these clowns into office INGO Republicans.

I'm not sure how we can automatically assume a third party in office would have done any better. What are we to base this on? Their track record at the national/federal level? By their rhetoric? Is their rhetoric any more trust worthy than the republicans that promised us they'd fix all this if only we elected them? People are people and I don't necessarily see this as a missed opportunity.

 

[Thegeek]

I was about to email Todd Young about his yea vote. Then I read the relevant part of the bill. Someone please point out the problem:

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-115hr1625eah/pdf/BILLS-115hr1625eah.pdf

Fix NICS is under Division S, Title VI which starts on page 1904 (page 1906 of the PDF).

So far, everything I've read either clarifies a previous definition, establishes accountability, reporting and implementation of the reporting of crime to NICS. What am I missing?

 

[churchmouse]

Lol.....good job voting these clowns into office INGO Republicans.

We were better off with Obama and a divided 3 branches that did nothing. We'd be better off with Hilldawg in the White House. At least then, nothing would get done and it'd be a gridlocked .gov.

So this is all our fault....really. What did you do to stop it....vote independent. Yeah that worked out real well huh...

They all suck. All of them.

 

[2A_Tom]

Voting third party is as effective as voting Republican in Chicago.

 

[Beowulf]

I'm not sure how we can automatically assume a third party in office would have done any better. What are we to base this on? Their track record at the national/federal level? By their rhetoric? Is their rhetoric any more trust worthy than the republicans that promised us they'd fix all this if only we elected them? People are people and I don't necessarily see this as a missed opportunity.

So vote Republican, right?

You know that saying about the definition of insanity... what was it again?

 

[Tombs]

So vote Republican, right?

You know that saying about the definition of insanity... what was it again?

Voting independent when an independent hasn't won in any of our lifetimes, seems like the perfect definition of insanity to me.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

So vote Republican, right?

You know that saying about the definition of insanity... what was it again?

True. But are we to believe "better angels" reside in another party simply because they espouse certain positions they've never had to test in real life, on the national level, interacting and working with people from other parties, with differing goals and objectives? I know they sound interesting, maybe compelling on certain issues. But at the end of the day, they're simply men and women saying stuff to get your vote. Many of the so-called conservatives said appealing stuff too and they got lots of votes. People are people. And I'm not convinced just because they align with a different party name, we can automatically assume the sausage that they would have made would be that much different.