My response to Mr. Coons (schaffer@rose-hulman.edu):
"There's no possible way law enforcement or anyone else can respond faster than those attacked if those attacked are armed. I disagree with Rose Hulman's policy for a disarmed faculty and disarmed student body even though those adults are capable and licensed to do so. Regardless of the plan, if Chris Mercer had decided to step onto the Rose campus, with the current disarming policies in place, the result would have been about the same. Unless you are planning to embed armed security, or allow licensed carriers to carry on campus, running away or hiding until LEO arrives won't save anyone."
Well played, sir. I hope it doesn't result in problems for your kid. I hold no hope of you receiving any kind of positive response. You'll either get ignored, a form letter, or a heapin' helpin' o' politically correct/newspeak crap.
I never was as impressed with Rose-Hulman as they seem to be with themselves. I didn't go there, but I back my opinion with that of TWO graduates who are now PG's in the "Real World". Despite being very well educated, they both found that RH's claims to notoriety do not, in fact, hold any more water than anybody else's when sitting in front of an interview board composed of Engineers of the highest level.
You base this on a whopping sample size of 2? Heh heh heh. How droll.