Well, for once, Wiki has a good article on this. You can verify it other places.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_USS_Forrestal_fire
Issues with Zuni rockets[edit]
In addition to bombs, the ground attack aircraft carried unguided 5.0 in (127.0 mm) Mk-32 "Zuni" rockets. These rockets were in wide use although they had a reputation for electrical difficulties and accidental firing.[SUP][6][/SUP] It was common for aircraft to launch with six or more rocket packs, each containing four rockets.[SUP][6][/SUP]
Unstable ordnance received[edit]
On 28 July, the day before the accident, Forrestal was resupplied with ordnance from the ammunition shipUSS Diamond Head. The load included sixteen 1000-lb AN/M65A1 "fat boy" bombs (so nicknamed because of their short, rotund shape), which Diamond Head had picked up from the Naval Base Subic Bay and were intended for the next day's second bombing sortie. Some of the batch of AN-M65A1s Forrestal received were more than a decade old, having spent a portion of that exposed to the heat and humidity of Okinawa or Guam,[SUP][9][/SUP] eventually being improperly stored in open-air Quonset huts at a disused ammunition dump on the periphery of Subic Bay Naval Base. Unlike the thick-cased Mark 83 bombs filled with Composition H6, the AN/M65A1 bombs were thin-skinned and filled with Composition B, an older explosive with greater shock and heat sensitivity.
Composition B also had the dangerous tendency to become more powerful (up to 50% by weight) and more sensitive if it was old or improperly stored. Forrestal's ordnance handlers had never even seen an AN/M65A1 before, and to their shock, the bombs delivered from Diamond Head were in terrible condition; coated with "decades of accumulated rust and grime" and still in their original packing crates (now moldy and rotten); some were stamped with production dates as early as 1953. Most dangerous of all, several bombs were seen to be leaking liquid paraffin phlegmatizing agent from their seams, an unmistakable sign that the bomb's explosive filler had degenerated with excessive age, and exposure to heat and moisture
I did see this article as well. I’m sure there are many theories that have been espoused. I will concede the article I read about the wet start was not confirmed by the Navy. Regardless, there was enough blame to go around for that terrible tragedy - especially by the higher ups who authorized use of the older ordinance. The net result was just another tragic example of that damn political war. I just attended a funeral of one of my friends who died of Parkinson’s Disease. He believed exposure to agent orange during his tour in Nam was the cause. I believed him when he told me.
Thanks for posting all of this information, acteon277. Particularly the video, what an effort those hours and days must have been.
I did see this article as well. I’m sure there are many theories that have been espoused. I will concede the article I read about the wet start was not confirmed by the Navy. Regardless, there was enough blame to go around for that terrible tragedy - especially by the higher ups who authorized use of the older ordinance. The net result was just another tragic example of that damn political war. I just attended a funeral of one of my friends who died of Parkinson’s Disease. He believed exposure to agent orange during his tour in Nam was the cause. I believed him when he told me.
IT WASN'T A WET START.
WTF?
Why does this lie keep spreading?
1) His plane was in the flight path of the missile. So, did the missile do a frickin U turn?
The missile came from the OTHER side of the carrier.
2) The missile ignition was because of switching from generator to internal plane power. It caused a voltage spike. This STILL HAPPENS TODAY.
This is why missiles are not armed till the plane is on the Cat. So if it goes off, it there is no BOOM.
The missile was launched by Lt Cmdr Bangert's plane. It was determined that the pin to prevent this, was missing. Either to speed up the launch process, or just plain fell out. The pins to get worn after hundreds of use.
Well, for once, Wiki has a good article on this. You can verify it other places.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_USS_Forrestal_fire
Issues with Zuni rockets[edit]
In addition to bombs, the ground attack aircraft carried unguided 5.0 in (127.0 mm) Mk-32 "Zuni" rockets. These rockets were in wide use although they had a reputation for electrical difficulties and accidental firing.[SUP][6][/SUP] It was common for aircraft to launch with six or more rocket packs, each containing four rockets.[SUP][6][/SUP]
Unstable ordnance received[edit]
On 28 July, the day before the accident, Forrestal was resupplied with ordnance from the ammunition shipUSS Diamond Head. The load included sixteen 1000-lb AN/M65A1 "fat boy" bombs (so nicknamed because of their short, rotund shape), which Diamond Head had picked up from the Naval Base Subic Bay and were intended for the next day's second bombing sortie. Some of the batch of AN-M65A1s Forrestal received were more than a decade old, having spent a portion of that exposed to the heat and humidity of Okinawa or Guam,[SUP][9][/SUP] eventually being improperly stored in open-air Quonset huts at a disused ammunition dump on the periphery of Subic Bay Naval Base. Unlike the thick-cased Mark 83 bombs filled with Composition H6, the AN/M65A1 bombs were thin-skinned and filled with Composition B, an older explosive with greater shock and heat sensitivity.
Composition B also had the dangerous tendency to become more powerful (up to 50% by weight) and more sensitive if it was old or improperly stored. Forrestal's ordnance handlers had never even seen an AN/M65A1 before, and to their shock, the bombs delivered from Diamond Head were in terrible condition; coated with "decades of accumulated rust and grime" and still in their original packing crates (now moldy and rotten); some were stamped with production dates as early as 1953. Most dangerous of all, several bombs were seen to be leaking liquid paraffin phlegmatizing agent from their seams, an unmistakable sign that the bomb's explosive filler had degenerated with excessive age, and exposure to heat and moisture
Plane 110, a PHANTOM, launched the missile.
McCain was in a SKYHAWK, #416, on the other side. It was hit, along with the SKYHAWK #405, Lt. Cmdr. White.
So, McCain was on the OTHER SIDE of the carrier, and not even in the TYPE OF PLANE that launched the missile.
Yet, people keep spreading the lie around.
President Trump offered his “deepest sympathies and respect” to the family of Senator John McCain on Saturday night, setting aside a yearslong, bitter and often deeply personal feud between the two men that had lasted into the senator’s final days.
The president shared his condolences in a tweet, shortly after it was announced that Mr. McCain, who had been battling brain cancer, had died.
“Our hearts and prayers are with you!” he said.
The White House flag was lowered to half-staff on Saturday night in honor of Mr. McCain.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/26/us/politics/john-mccain-trump.html
Not to put too fine a point on it, but his ACCOUNT posted.
You have ZERO idea who wrote the post, and it wasn't on the POTUS account.
The flag over the Whitehouse is at full staff, and Trump has made ZERO official statement.
Unexcusable...
Shows exactly what kind of person he is (notice I didn't write 'Man').
Not to put too fine a point on it, but his ACCOUNT posted.
You have ZERO idea who wrote the post, and it wasn't on the POTUS account.
The flag over the Whitehouse is at full staff, and Trump has made ZERO official statement.
Unexcusable...
Shows exactly what kind of person he is (notice I didn't write 'Man').
The flag WAS at half mast but as of this morning it's back at full mast.
The way McCain talked about Pres Trump I wouldn't have anything nice to say to or about McCain either.
JM went Dick Lugar by being in office too long.
I don't talk bad about the dead usually and I'll hold my tongue on this guy as well.