People carry those P3AT and the like as their self-defense gun of choice all the time. Crappy sights and anemic rounds... I own a 642 .38 but I don't typically carry it off-duty (but it is FAR better choice than a P3AT). I would have to reload 3 times just to match what I load in a single magazine of my G19 that is my primary off-duty gun. I used to own a P3AT and sold it when I came to the realization that it was a poor choice for a gun fight.Who carries but doesn't carry enough gun? Not being critical Bee Dub, just wondering if that's a thing.
Who carries but doesn't carry enough gun? Not being critical Bee Dub, just wondering if that's a thing.
WinnerI go with "depends", because there are too many variable.
And because I don't want a lawyer going through my INGO posts second guessing me.
People carry those P3AT and the like as their self-defense gun of choice all the time. Crappy sights and anemic rounds... I own a 642 .38 but I don't typically carry it off-duty (but it is FAR better choice than a P3AT). I would have to reload 3 times just to match what I load in a single magazine of my G19 that is my primary off-duty gun. I used to own a P3AT and sold it when I came to the realization that it was a poor choice for a gun fight.
While I would agree that a P3AT or an LCP aren't an optimal choice to use in a gun fight, I do think the have their place. I can see it being used as a BUG or maybe in a situation of someone not being allowed to carry while at work, but can very easily conceal such a gun and fly under any radar so to speak. While its not the wisest choice for edc it may be better than looking for something to throw should a really bad situation arise. I have such a gun that may or may not ride in my lunch box...just in case
S&W 642 as a bug. Loaded for bear. Anywhere in that Subway it would be lethal.
Criminals pulling a gun out and threatening people is my bright line. There is no safe distance, direction, or response time at that point. You are seconds between them threatening the cashier to killing you and yours. If you assume anything else you will not have time to respond. In a place as small as that Subway a person with a knife is a valid threat...
If by chance I am sitting there solo or with friends/family and this goes down yes my gun will be in my hand but at the low ready. Out of casual sight.
I guess it depends on how you carry, but I would imagine it being difficult to unholster and not be noticed. The thug doing the robbery is probably on some kind of adrenaline rush ready to turn towards anyone else in the room he thinks could stop him. All he gotta do is notice your hands out of view and swing the gun towards your direction. Then, you'd be at a disadvantage if he's already got that thing pointed in your face and is demanding you show your hands or hand over your own weapon or else.
The decision becomes much more complex when you introduce family members (especially depending on ages) into the scenario. If possible, my first priority is to get them OUT. Back door, etc, they get out. If I cannot, then I need to get them out of fire. Last thing I want to do is engage in a gun battle where my kids/wife are bullet sponges. When I search a prisoner and find 1 gun, I keep searching because I assume there are 2. It's the +1 rule. Same with bad guys. You see 1, assume there are 2. You see 2, assume there are 3. Etc...etc. I might not have a choice but to engage the suspect. However, depending on circumstances, it might be my last choice. I've seen it. I couldn't live with myself if I drew fire that found my family instead. I know this isn't the BRAVADO thing to say. You know, I will engage the suspect REGARDLESS. It's not realistic.This is along the lines that I am thinking. But the if I have the family with me answer does not "seem" to be thinking along these lines.
The decision becomes much more complex when you introduce family members (especially depending on ages) into the scenario. If possible, my first priority is to get them OUT. Back door, etc, they get out. If I cannot, then I need to get them out of fire. Last thing I want to do is engage in a gun battle where my kids/wife are bullet sponges. When I search a prisoner and find 1 gun, I keep searching because I assume there are 2. It's the +1 rule. Same with bad guys. You see 1, assume there are 2. You see 2, assume there are 3. Etc...etc. I might not have a choice but to engage the suspect. However, depending on circumstances, it might be my last choice. I've seen it. I couldn't live with myself if I drew fire that found my family instead. I know this isn't the BRAVADO thing to say. You know, I will engage the suspect REGARDLESS. It's not realistic.
1911 compact in .45. 7+1 plus a spare mag in the coat. If I need more than that I’m in the wrong place
As far as situational awareness is concerned, wasn't it mentioned above by LEO's and locals that they wouldn't be there in the first place?
I get made fun of for my urban paranoia when it comes to food, shopping or fuel stops in the city. If I'm not familiar with the establishment and there is a choice in the matter, I always err on the side of driving out of the city for my stops.
As far as situational awareness is concerned, wasn't it mentioned above by LEO's and locals that they wouldn't be there in the first place?
I get made fun of for my urban paranoia when it comes to food, shopping or fuel stops in the city. If I'm not familiar with the establishment and there is a choice in the matter, I always err on the side of driving out of the city for my stops.
As far as situational awareness is concerned, wasn't it mentioned above by LEO's and locals that they wouldn't be there in the first place?
I get made fun of for my urban paranoia when it comes to food, shopping or fuel stops in the city. If I'm not familiar with the establishment and there is a choice in the matter, I always err on the side of driving out of the city for my stops.