The first one that was more biographical was my favorite, but all of them were, as you say, entertaining. He loved his ossifers.Yep. He's an entertaining guy, to say the least.
The first one that was more biographical was my favorite, but all of them were, as you say, entertaining. He loved his ossifers.Yep. He's an entertaining guy, to say the least.
Wait, what? Donkey show thread?I suggest the Big Cat-2 Donkeys thread. Early results show it could be a classic.
Woohoo! A new outrage of the day!
- Trump didn't visit the troops at Christmas time! (This lie started before Christmas was even over.).
- The first lady wears combat boots! (Really? How pathetic.)
- US Troops getting MAGA hats signed is a campaign violation! (Really? Troops aren't allowed to have their own hats signed by the president or to agree with the concept of making America great?)
- Trump outs Seal Team 5! (Actually, Newsweek outed them.)
All spin, all the time. Shouldn't be long for the next made-up outrage. Does most of the MSM even bother to make corrections any more?
All spin, all the time. Shouldn't be long for the next made-up outrage. Does most of the MSM even bother to make corrections any more?
I might just have to check it out now.I suggest the Big Cat-2 Donkeys thread. Early results show it could be a classic.
So... I'm wondering what this SEAL team issue is a distraction from.
[FONT="]Silicon Valley billionaire and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman on Wednesday apologized for giving[/FONT][FONT="] $750,000 to American Engagement Technologies[/FONT][FONT="] (AET),[/FONT][FONT="]Hoffman maintained in a statement Wednesday that his mega-donation toward the Russian-influenced political disinformation campaign in the important race was just an unfortunate oopsie and said he's now very sorry.[/FONT]
[FONT="]“[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]I want to make it clear from the outset that I had never even heard of this project before[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="] reading about it in the Times’ coverage,” Hoffman said in the statement. “The Times articles imply that I had knowledge of it and that I endorsed its tactics. Let me be absolutely clear: I do not."[/FONT]
Well, sort of yes and no. I've worked a few Presidential details here in Indy and they cannot vett everyone. If he is in a secure facility and he decides to meet with a group, there is not much the USSS can do about it. He takes pics with our officers working his detail EVERY time he is in town and the USSS doesn't know who we are.
Well, sort of yes and no. I've worked a few Presidential details here in Indy and they cannot vett everyone. If he is in a secure facility and he decides to meet with a group, there is not much the USSS can do about it. He takes pics with our officers working his detail EVERY time he is in town and the USSS doesn't know who we are.
They didn't know who you were...that's some comedy right there.
Having worked with them quite a bit, you give them too much credit. Also, who is working is so fluid that there is no way they know all the officers working the details, not even close.They didn't know who you were...that's some comedy right there.
How could they miss a guy riding an elephant?
Having worked with them quite a bit, you give them too much credit. Also, who is working is so fluid that there is no way they know all the officers working the details, not even close.
1. Yeah, much like military.I understand what you are saying. My questions would be.
- Have you been vetted by your department? Have other agencies vetted their employees?
- How difficult would it be for me to dress as someone in your department and get close to the President? How about other agencies?
- Were you a 24 fan?