Twitter users apparently now going after Black Rifle Coffee Company

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • eldirector

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Apr 29, 2009
    14,677
    113
    Brownsburg, IN
    Beyond Black going into the pot right now. I've been getting 2 bags every 3 weeks for a while now, and let them pick (the "Best Of" choice when you set up delivery). It was a treat from my wife, to keep me off of soda. It's working. :D

    Checked in here to make sure I wasn't supposed to boycott someone. Guess we are still on the BRCC bandwagon? I'm so confused...(purple if needed. If not, carry on).
     

    IndyTim

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 8, 2013
    37
    9
    I don't believe BRCC is anything but Pro 2nd Amendment. I assume (I could be wrong here too) that they are donating just to sort of pay to play in their local political market or simply supporting Democrat candidates that will legislate from the middle. Not all Democrats are bad, there are a lot that actually legislate from the middle instead of the extremes. If I was in a Primarily (assumption here too) blue district, I might donate to the moderate democrat to avoid the extreme one :dunno:.

    Does this actually happen? When was the last time that democrat backed federal legislation was blocked because a democrat voted against it?
     

    OneBadV8

    Stay Picky my Friends
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    52   0   0
    Aug 7, 2008
    55,568
    101
    Ft Wayne
    Does this actually happen? When was the last time that democrat backed federal legislation was blocked because a democrat voted against it?
    I don't think Harry Reid would ever commit to voting against some of it. But yes, I know there are some moderate democrats.

    You can't honestly believe of all the 230 democrats in the house that every single one of them wants to disarm you.
     

    OneBadV8

    Stay Picky my Friends
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    52   0   0
    Aug 7, 2008
    55,568
    101
    Ft Wayne
    Be nice if people didn't have to make EVERY. ****ING. THING. political. It's coffee.

    Yep. And I'd prefer people did it the way he did it. On his personal time, with his personal money, without making a speech and saying this is our stance as a company (like Starbucks, etc).

    I think people just like to be pissed off at something. I understand why they said they didn't endorse or have an agreement with the kid. They're trying to stay out of it and also make sure people know they're not taking advantage of the situation to try and profit from it. Oh well, can't please everyone.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,583
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Yep. And I'd prefer people did it the way he did it. On his personal time, with his personal money, without making a speech and saying this is our stance as a company (like Starbucks, etc).

    I think people just like to be pissed off at something. I understand why they said they didn't endorse or have an agreement with the kid. They're trying to stay out of it and also make sure people know they're not taking advantage of the situation to try and profit from it. Oh well, can't please everyone.

    Cancel culture isn't just for the left.
     

    IndyTim

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 8, 2013
    37
    9
    I don't think Harry Reid would ever commit to voting against some of it. But yes, I know there are some moderate democrats.

    You can't honestly believe of all the 230 democrats in the house that every single one of them wants to disarm you.

    There’s more to socialism than disarmament.
    The proof is in the pudding, democrats vote with democrats. The only time you see them voting against the party is when it doesn’t matter, when it doesn’t affect the outcome of a particular vote. This allows them to continue the myth of the moderate democrat. It’s why we have ObamaCare, they’re in lock-step.

    And, yeah, if their vote was needed to push through gun control, I have no doubt that every single democrat would toe the party line.

    I’m referring to the federal level, I can see that we potentially have moderates at the state/local level.
     

    OneBadV8

    Stay Picky my Friends
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    52   0   0
    Aug 7, 2008
    55,568
    101
    Ft Wayne
    There’s more to socialism than disarmament.
    The proof is in the pudding, democrats vote with democrats. The only time you see them voting against the party is when it doesn’t matter, when it doesn’t affect the outcome of a particular vote. This allows them to continue the myth of the moderate democrat. It’s why we have ObamaCare, they’re in lock-step.

    And, yeah, if their vote was needed to push through gun control, I have no doubt that every single democrat would toe the party line.

    I’m referring to the federal level, I can see that we potentially have moderates at the state/local level.
    I think most politicians just want to stay in power. They'll play by whichever rules they need to in order to get re-elected. I think if you were a Dem in a VERY Pro-Gun area, and were getting donations from the NRA, you'd likely either vote no, or just vote present on those issues. Both of which would be better than a Yes vote. I think a lot more people vote present so they don't have to choose a side when it comes between their party and their money.
     

    IndyTim

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 8, 2013
    37
    9
    I think most politicians just want to stay in power. They'll play by whichever rules they need to in order to get re-elected. I think if you were a Dem in a VERY Pro-Gun area, and were getting donations from the NRA, you'd likely either vote no, or just vote present on those issues. Both of which would be better than a Yes vote. I think a lot more people vote present so they don't have to choose a side when it comes between their party and their money.

    Yeah, I agree. They want to stay in power, which means they don’t want to lose a primary. Which means they will toe the line.

    I just don’t think the Present and No votes are being cast when it really matters.

    I could be wrong, of course. It is why I asked the question.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,136
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I don't think Harry Reid would ever commit to voting against some of it. But yes, I know there are some moderate democrats.

    You can't honestly believe of all the 230 democrats in the house that every single one of them wants to disarm you.

    Yes, actually I can. After watching them vote absolutely in lockstep to impeach Trump on the sketchiest of pretexts, I strongly suspect there isn't a conscience among them. At best, the 'moderates' might believe in disarming me more slowly/incrementally
     

    Ggreen

    Person
    Rating - 100%
    49   0   0
    Sep 19, 2016
    3,686
    77
    SouthEast
    They didn't denounce Kyle, they said they are not sponsoring or donating to him, meanwhile their ceo has public donations to very liberal pac's. Their coffee is terrible without any politics. Hubbard and Cravens please
     

    BR8818

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Nov 20, 2018
    718
    63
    Anderson
    I'd rather give money to company that stands up for the things I believe in, or is atleast neutral and doesn't cave in to the slightest pressure from the left. Especially a company that models their brand for "conservative" or "right leaning" people then does the opposite.
     
    Top Bottom