Sorry! ... start a new thread based on the Suarez article. It's a good read and deserves it's own post.
BTW ... I should have used purple when I said it might have been taken at a three-gun match. I think those guys look like they have a greater interest in fighting than looking cool, trendy, hot, or fashionable.
so your saying we choose to run the position we do based on being trendy cool,Hot, etc.....? your wrong if you do.
It looks like a take on CQB and MOUT stuff that the mlitary was teaching way before OIFOEF.
You beat me to it. Its almost like that article was tailor made for this thread.
But even these guys are closer to a more traditional hold than the new hold in which the support arm seems artificially extended and has the support arm higher than the rifle.
The one in this picture who is closest to the new trendy hold is the second guy back, and that's simply because he's a little guy who is trying to hold a rifle which is nearly as long as he is tall.
so your saying we choose to run the position we do based on being trendy cool,Hot, etc.....? your wrong if you do.
My mistake. I keep forgetting to use purple. That was a facetious comment ... mild jab at those who think that those are the only possible reasons (to be trendy, cool, hot, etc.) for the "new" technique. "New" being defined as something they are not familiar with.
OK, forgive my obvious ignorance, but "OIFOEF?"
But even these guys are closer to a more traditional hold than the new hold in which the support arm seems artificially extended and has the support arm higher than the rifle.
The one in this picture who is closest to the new trendy hold is the second guy back, and that's simply because he's a little guy who is trying to hold a rifle which is nearly as long as he is tall.
This video was just posted earlier today.
It's almost like INGOer Steve MI was reading this thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYjitNIEmzw&feature=feedu
So, off topic and probably a dumb question - but what kind of optic is that he is using?
So, off topic and probably a dumb question - but what kind of optic is that he is using?