Hoosierdood
Grandmaster
My biggest issue at this point is the people who feel they can discuss/criticize it when they have not seen it.
I don't need to watch a beheading to know that I don't like it.
My biggest issue at this point is the people who feel they can discuss/criticize it when they have not seen it.
So you actually watched the movie?
I'm going to make a movie demonstrating animal abuse by torturing animals on screen, instead of just using cut shots and implications.
And you can't judge it unless you watch the animal torture.
I totally agree with you on the pageant thing, DD.
I've not seen the movie and I don't plan to. The only photos I've seen are in this thread. I have not clicked on any links posted.
I am curious, though. If the actors were 18 and just looked young and portrayed 11 year olds would there still be the outrage? Is the outrage the fact that actual 11 year olds were acting out the scenes, the fact that the scenes were even filmed at all, or both?
They did not "dress her up for the movie promo". The way she was dressed at that moment was part of the plot.I really do not understand the difference between what DD said and the promo for cuties.
What is the difference? Help me understand what the difference between a young girl being dressed up like a call girl for a beauty pageant and how they are dressed up in the movie promo? Why is one acceptable and the other not?
Somebody hurry up and nuke this thread, please
I'll help things along.
When I saw this thread, I became curious. I thought the logical thing to do before I chimed in was to watch it so I would be able to discuss it intelligently. Apparently that is not an expectation shared by anyone else, because apparently I'm the only one who has actually seen it. That being said, I'm done here. I will no longer attempt to interrupt your outrage with logic or actual facts about the movie. Carry on.