No proof of Russians trying to help Trump. Many sources show coverup by the FBI And the DOJ for the Clintons colluding with Russia via the salacious and unverified dossier created by Christopher Steel and Hillary And Bill's violating the Logan act in selling off 20% of American uranium.
So I'll continue to point at the proof and you can keep up the Russians are Coming crap of the 70'.I do believe that when the CIA came up with the Conspiracy Theory term in the 60s was when they wanted to belittle the facts found to disprove the magic bullet theory in the JFK assassination. Way to hold the line... shill. Show me the proof Mueller! Until then I'll keep enjoying the actual evidentiary info coming out right now.Of course there’s no proof. Proof is a legal term.
Plenty of evidence though.
And I think you’re mixing up your conspiracy theories.
Reynolds Wrap is my preferred hat making material.
Less likely to tear and have the CIA mind waves scramble your signals.
This is the source that your NBC article sites in the 21 states bit. https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/h...tes-election-systems-targeted-hackers-n804031
My favorite part... "Only Illinois reported that hackers had succeeded in breaching its voter systems. Anyone ever notice that Illinois always has their butt covered for most anything or charge?
Colorado said the hacking wasn't quite a breach.
"It's really reconnaissance by a bad guy to try and figure out how we would break into your computer," said Trevor Timmons, a spokesman for the Colorado secretary of state's office. "It's not an attack. I wouldn't call it a probe. It's not a breach, it's not a penetration."
Well, the left will not let truth/facts get in the way of Trump bashing. Right now it is the biggest (imaginary) stick that they have.
We know that the DHS tried to breach state election systems. That has been reported. Inspector General Probes Obama Cyberattacks | The Daily Caller
We also know that US Spy agencies are known to spoof Russian and other hackers in attempts to hide their tracks. They can be anywhere in the world that they want to be. https://theintercept.com/document/2014/03/12/nsa-gchqs-quantumtheory-hacking-tactics/
It seems to me that any claim by the US spy agencies about anything has to be taken with a very large grain of salt. The leadership of these agencies have been proven to be liars (admitted perjury by James Clapper), communist voting John Brennan committing perjury to Congress when he said the CIA didn't spy on members of Congress and that there had been no collateral deaths from the CIAs drone assassination program.
Our spy agencies are liars. They illegally spy on us so why in the hell would anyone believe one thing that they say? THEY are our enemy, not some bogus Russian red herring.
Were you wearing your tin foil hat when you typed that ?
Not surprised that Illinois discovered hacking in the voting process, they certainly have had the most experience with "adjusting" elections. That system is probably full of back doors, all available at a price. I've wondered if the reason Blago was caught trying to sell a senate seat was because he went outside the system, wanting to keep all the money for himself.
Two, aren't the folks fulminating about the security of the voting process many of the same folks who wanted to institute changes to voting machinery/software that would eliminate accountability measures like a paper trail? I think a highly decentralized system is better as it requires much more successful hacking to have an effect. The thing to watch for would be hacking of the actual vote counting software at the manufacturer level because there are only a few types of voting machine extant. A much larger window of vulnerability would seem to be a "Target"-style hack of inserting malware into the machine operating system
How would that help? If Russia could potentially manipulate voter rolls, voter ID wouldn't help anything.
I bet in every district in the country you can file a provisional ballot and prove you should be on the rolls and your vote is counted, should you show up and not be on the rolls...
Was there massive reporting of people showing up and being told they weren't on the rolls? No? Ok... move on
Kut: do you support voter ID requirements to prove you are who you say you are?
Are you against motor voter laws where simply obtaining a drivers license allows you to register to vote without citizenship verification given that some states allow drivers license for noncitizens?
Do you oppose house delegates being decided by population instead of by citizen count? If there are 5 million illegal aliens in California for example, those are counted towards how many representatives California gets.
Just trying to get a baseline for how important you consider the integrity of our voter rolls to be