Nothwithstanding the “ a Conservation Officer in the state of Indiana has the greatest arrest powers of any law enforcement officer” theory, I see no reason why a CO needs to wear his service revolver when he is having lunch with his wife. One might argue that he isn’t really “on duty” if he has chosen to separate himself from his duty vehicle and enjoin himself with a family member.
That’s the most extreme argument that might be made -
With that being said, I do agree that the alarmist snowflake cited concern for her safety reference the armed officer so she could promote her own social justice liberal agenda. I suspect the ideologues who promote this way of thinking were reveling in the free publicity.
Am I wrong in the fact that LEO is required to carry even off duty. I could be wrong but that just sticks in my head.
A LEO in full dress and carrying is zero to be alarmed and yes this douche was pushing her ridiculous agenda at the expense of this individual and the establishment. How do we hold their feet to the fire when this ridiculous crap happens. Until we do there will be much more.